Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with minimal-surfaces
Search options not deleted
user 51695
For questions about minimal surfaces in the sense of Riemannian geometry (as opposed to complex geometry).
2
votes
How to interpret this quote of Lin?
This is not a full answer, since I do not know the counterexample Lin refers to, but I can offer some explanations and guesses which are too long for a comment:
You can define a first variation for cu …
- 2,504
2
votes
Flat norm of currents and minimal surfaces
Leo Moos gave a very good answer, but here is another way to think about this:
Essentially equality does not hold when it is cheaper to have a the boundary of a hole than filling that hole. So if $S$ …
- 2,504
1
vote
When is a $1$-varifold $V$ the associated varifold of the reduced boundary of some Caccioppo...
I think the obvious way is indeed the only way. First of all $n_j=1$ for all $j$, as boundaries do not have higher multiplicity.
Secondly, the $l$ rays of your varifold split $\mathbb{R}^2$ into $l$ s …
- 2,504