Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with galois-cohomology
Search options not deleted
user 51164
9
votes
Accepted
Nonabelian $H^2$ and Galois descent
Let me elaborate more on the remark above. Let $k$ be a perfect field. Let $\mathrm{Field}_k$ denote the category of finite extensions of $k$, i.e., the objects of $\mathrm{Field}_k$ are fields $k'$ e …
- 9,491
7
votes
1
answer
494
views
A vanishing condition for cup products in Galois cohomology
Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $\neq 2$. For a non-zero element $a \in k^*$, let us write $[a] \in H^1(k,\mathbb{Z}/2)$ for the Galois cohomology class corresponding to the quadratic extension $ …
- 9,491
2
votes
A vanishing condition for cup products in Galois cohomology
After realizing that the claim is wrong (thanks to the answers above), I managed to find a weaker statement, that turned out to be what I needed anyway. So just in case someone else happens to be inte …
- 9,491
2
votes
Accepted
A question on the injectivity of a canonical map between galois cohomology groups
I believe this map is always injective. Here is a quick argument: first note that $K'$ is normal over $k$ (because it is invariant under any automorphism of the algebraic closure of $k$ which preserve …
- 9,491