Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
7
votes
1
answer
494
views
A vanishing condition for cup products in Galois cohomology
Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $\neq 2$. For a non-zero element $a \in k^*$, let us write $[a] \in H^1(k,\mathbb{Z}/2)$ for the Galois cohomology class corresponding to the quadratic extension $ …
2
votes
A vanishing condition for cup products in Galois cohomology
After realizing that the claim is wrong (thanks to the answers above), I managed to find a weaker statement, that turned out to be what I needed anyway. So just in case someone else happens to be inte …
2
votes
Accepted
A question on the injectivity of a canonical map between galois cohomology groups
I believe this map is always injective. Here is a quick argument: first note that $K'$ is normal over $k$ (because it is invariant under any automorphism of the algebraic closure of $k$ which preserve …
9
votes
Accepted
Nonabelian $H^2$ and Galois descent
Let me elaborate more on the remark above. Let $k$ be a perfect field. Let $\mathrm{Field}_k$ denote the category of finite extensions of $k$, i.e., the objects of $\mathrm{Field}_k$ are fields $k'$ e …