Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with laplacian
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 4572
The Laplacian matrix is the representation of a graph in matrix form.
10
votes
Accepted
Adjoint of a Connection Using the Hodge Map?
Yes, even in a more general situation: Let $E\to M$ be a vector bundle with metric and metric connection $\nabla.$ Then there exists $d^\nabla\colon\Omega^k(M,E)\to\Omega^{k+1}(M,E)$ satisfying $d^\na …
- 6,825
10
votes
First nonzero eigenvalue of the Laplacian on the submanifold
In the general case (especially for high codimension) there will not be such a relation: Every compact Riemannian manifold can be isometrically embedded into the Euclidean space $R^N$. As the image of …
- 6,825
5
votes
Accepted
Realization of symbol of Laplace operator via certain integral
No: the operator must be of even order, and therefore the symbol of the adjoint operator $D^*$ is the same as the symbol of $D$. Hence we can assume without loss of generality that $D$ is symmetric. B …
- 6,825