Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Philosophical aspects of logic and set theory; truth status of mathematical axioms; Philosophy of Mathematics; philosophical aspects of mathematics in general; relation of mathematics to philosophy; etc. Consider also posting at http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/, where philosophy-of-mathematics is one of the most popular tags.
115
votes
Nontrivial theorems with trivial proofs
The additivity of expected value is absolutely trivial to prove, but (I think) mind-blowing that it is true.
Also, the fact that (finite) sums/products of vector spaces are isomorphic. Extremely eas …
7
votes
The impact of large cardinals in mathematics
I guess this is relevant to Question 4: In the paper
Implications of large-cardinal principles in homotopical localization. Adv. Math. 197 (2005), no. 1, 120–139. by Casacuberta, Carles; Scevenel …
58
votes
Can a mathematical definition be wrong?
I was involved in such a case. My thesis advisor (S. Husseini) and his coauthor (E. Fadell)
defined the "category weight" of a cohomology class in a way that allowed them to prove the theorem they wa …