Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
History and philosophy of mathematics, biographies of mathematicians, mathematics education, recreational mathematics, communication of mathematics.
14
votes
3
answers
954
views
Narayana and Fermat's Factorization Method
In some notes of mine I have found a comment according to which the Indian mathematician Narayana Pandit (14th century) found the prime factors of $1161$ by writing it in the form $1161 = 35^2-8^2$. U …
16
votes
2
answers
3k
views
The parity conjecture
The parity conjecture for elliptic curves predicts that the rank of an elliptic curve
defined over the rationals has the same parity as the p-Selmer rank for a prime number p. Could anyone familiar wi …
19
votes
2
answers
2k
views
History of Irrationality results
The Greeks knew that numbers of the form $\sqrt{n}$ for nonsquare
integers $n$ are not rational. Much later, Lambert (1768) proved that
the values of $e^x$ and $\tan x$ are irrational for nonzero rat …
40
votes
1
answer
3k
views
First correct proof of FLT for exponent 3?
It is well known that Euler gave the first proof of FLT ($x^n + y^n = z^n$ has
no nontrivial integral solutions for $n > 2$) for exponent $n=3$, but that his proof
had gaps (which are not as easily cl …
7
votes
1
answer
729
views
Fibonacci = Leonardo Pisano?
Leonardo of Pisa is best known as Fibonacci; various stories found in books and on the web claim that the name Fibonacci was invented by Edouard Lucas or Guillaume Libri in the 19th century, and that …
11
votes
5
answers
2k
views
Christening Fermat's Little Theorem
I am writing an article on Fermat's work in number theory and feel uncomfortable everytime I have to write "Fermat's Little Theorem": it's clumsy and belittles the fundamental character of Fermat's re …
23
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Dirichlet and the prime number theorem
I browsed Dirichlets Werke today and was kind of surprised by two remarks that he made on p. 354 (Über die Bestimmung ...) and p. 372 (Sur l'usage ...). In the second paper, he claims (my translation) …
1
vote
1
answer
1k
views
Unique factorization in polynomial rings
Everybody knows that polynomial rings over fields have unique factorization, and that if $R$ has unique factorization, then so does $R[X]$. And everybody knows who proved these results first.
Well, …
20
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Irrational logs and the harmonic series
Consider the series
$$ S_f = \sum_{x=1}^\infty \frac{f}{x^2+fx}. $$
Goldbach showed that, for integers $f \ge 1$,
$$ S_f = 1 + \frac12 + \frac13 + \ldots + \frac1f $$
(this follows easily by writing …