Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Enriched categories, topoi, abelian categories, monoidal categories, homological algebra.
3
votes
Accepted
Why are pushouts the right tool in these setups
$\DeclareMathOperator\colim{colim}\newcommand\uHom{\underline{\operatorname{Hom}}}$For the second question, it sounds like you have the right idea already.
For the first, one way to view the situation …
37
votes
3
answers
6k
views
Conjectures in Grothendieck's "Pursuing stacks"
I read on the nLab that in "Pursuing stacks" Grothendieck made several interesting conjectures, some of which have been proved since then. For example, as David Roberts wrote in answer to this questi …
41
votes
A bestiary of topologies on Sch
I have just discovered a chart comparing topologies on Sch/S, made by Pieter Belmans. It includes all the topologies discussed above, and some more I haven't even heard of. It's even interactive and …
6
votes
Accepted
Do $RHom(C,D)$ and $DG(C,D)$ have equivalent homotopy categories?
Toen proved that $RHom$ provides the internal hom in the homotopy category of dg-categories. For what you want to be true, you need something more than this: you need to know that $RHom$ is actually …
14
votes
Accepted
Geometric morphism of $\infty$ topos
I never found any discussion about this in HTT either, but it turns out to work exactly the same way as in SGA 4.
That is, let $f^* : P(D) \to P(C)$ denote the restriction functor on presheaves, and …
10
votes
Accepted
Is dgCat a category or a 2-category?
The model structure on the category of dg-categories presents an $(\infty,1)$-category DGCat. This structure is essentially provided by the existence of mapping spaces (or mapping $\infty$-groupoids) …
9
votes
How to show the following two definitions of homotopy monomorphism are equivalent?
Let $sSet$ be the category of simplicial sets with the Quillen model structure. Define a homotopy monomorphism in $sSet$ to be a morphism whose homotopy fibres are empty or weakly contractible. In a …
5
votes
Accepted
A question about the morphisms in the homotopy category of dg-Cat
More generally one has the following statement: if $u : C \to D$ is a quasi-fully faithful functor of dg-categories, then the induced morphism of mapping spaces in the model category of dg-categories …
3
votes
Does a fully faithful functor between triangulated categories induce embedding of their Grot...
One should really only talk about $K_0$ of small categories, otherwise one runs into the difficulty explained in Matthias's comment. Assuming $\mathcal{B}$ is small, let me identify $\mathcal{A}$ wit …
3
votes
A general theory of quasi-functors, generalizing from dg-categories to $\mathcal V$-categori...
In some sense, the "universal" version of this fact was proved by Blumberg-Gepner-Tabuada as Proposition 3.3 in this paper.
That is, they proved the analogue for stable $\infty$-categories, which is t …
3
votes
An example of two cofibrant dg categories whose tensor product is not cofibrant
Let $\Delta^1_k$ be the $k$-linear dg-category with two objects $0$ and $1$, mapping complexes
$$ Map(0,0) = [k], $$
$$ Map(0,1) = [k], $$
$$ Map(1,0) = [0], $$
$$ Map(1,1) = [k] $$
where $[k] …
2
votes
Accepted
Existence of ind-right adjoint functor for semi-simple category?
The functor $\Sigma$ admits an ind-adjoint if and only if it is left exact (SGA 4, Exp. I, 8.11.4). Every short exact sequence in a semisimple abelian category splits, and $\Sigma$ commutes with fini …
3
votes
Good properties of the $H^0$ functor (from quasi-functors to ordinary functors)
In the framework of $\infty$-categories, I think it is not difficult to see that your claim for $\mathcal{A} = \Delta^1$ holds for all $\infty$-groupoids.
Let $K$ be an $\infty$-groupoid (Kan complex …
1
vote
It looks so coKleisli, but it's not. What is it?
This is close to the notion of orbit category appearing for example in
Bernhard Keller, On triangulated orbit categories, http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0503240
and section 7 of
Gonçalo Tabuada, Chow …