Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 2481

Computational Number Theory is for explicit calculations or algorithms involving anything of interest to number theorists.

8 votes

Coefficient field of a newform using Magma

Here is code in Sage which does what you're asking for: sage: t = cputime() ....: f = Newforms(123, names='a')[3] ....: print(f.hecke_eigenvalue_field()) ....: E = EllipticCurve('389a') ....: for p i …
David Loeffler's user avatar
21 votes

What computer program for automorphic forms

The only CAS's that have built-in support for modular and automorphic forms, as far as I know, are Sage and Magma. [Edit: I had forgotten Pari/GP, which will introduce substantial modular forms functi …
David Loeffler's user avatar
10 votes

Computing millions of coefficients of non self-dual modular forms

One shortcut you could use for computing the level 17 form you link to would be the following. There are exactly 8 Eisenstein series of weight 1 for $\Gamma_1(17)$ and they are all given by completely …
David Loeffler's user avatar
16 votes
Accepted

Computing an eigencuspform in $S_2(\Gamma_0(1776))$

I did the computation in Sage, and there is no such form $f$. There are 21 Galois orbits of newforms of level $\Gamma_0(1776)$ and trivial character, of which the largest has size 3, and none of the r …
David Loeffler's user avatar
5 votes

Numerical evaluation of the Petersson product of elliptic modular forms

It's easy to reduce to the case of computing the Petersson product of a normalised new eigenform with itself. Here you can use the fact that the product is equal to the value at s=k of the symmetric s …
David Loeffler's user avatar