Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
For questions about matchings in graph theory. A matching on a graph is a set of edges such that no two edges share a common vertex.
1
vote
Would a graph with such maximum weighted matchings exist?
Such a gadget does not exist.
Proof for original vertex version. Suppose such a graph $G$ exists. Let $x,y$, and $z$ be the distinguished vertices. Let $M_1$ be a maximum weight matching which cove …
4
votes
Expanding Hall's theorem
Let $G$ be a bipartite graph with bipartition $(L,R)$. A necessary and sufficient condition for each vertex on the left to be matched to two vertices on the right is $|N_G(X)| \geq 2|X|$ for all $X \ …
11
votes
An analysis proof of the Hall marriage theorem
As requested in the comments, there is a standard proof of Hall's Marriage Theorem from the max-flow min-cut theorem. Let $G$ be a bipartite graph satisfying Hall's condition, with bipartition $(A,B) …
4
votes
Accepted
Stable marriages for infinite bipartite graphs
Your formal version does not look correct. For each boy $b$, there should be a total order $\leq_b$ on the set of girls $G$ (this is the preference order for $b$) and for each girl $g$, there should …
5
votes
Maximum matchings in infinite graphs
No, this is not possible. Here is an elaboration of Eric Wofsey's comment.
Suppose it is possible and let $M$ be a maximal (under inclusion) matching of $G$ (this exists by Zorn's lemma). Then $| …
1
vote
How does this algorithmic proof of Edmonds-Gallai work?
Here is another approach that fails for a different reason. Perhaps the two failures can be merged into success, but I have not thought about this too deeply.
It suffices to prove the claim for shri …
1
vote
Generalization of Marshall Hall's Theorem to non-simple bipartite graphs
As I mentioned in the comments, I am not exactly sure what "a finite number of special infinite families of graphs" means, but here is a way to construct an infinite number of counterexamples for all …
3
votes
Accepted
What's the name of the graph operation of connecting two copies of a graph with a perfect ma...
I dont't know of a standard name, but it is $G \square K_2$, where $\square$ denotes the Cartesian product.
3
votes
Accepted
Induced matching number
It is unlikely that a nice characterization exists because the problem of computing the size of a maximum induced matching is a well-known NP-hard problem, even for bipartite graphs (as mentioned by P …
4
votes
Accepted
2-approximation algorithm for Minimum Maximal Matching (MMM) problem
There is an easy $2$-approximation algorithm for finding a minimum size maximal matching. Simply find any maximal matching. Note that a maximal matching $M$ can be found greedily. Initialize $M=\em …
10
votes
Number of matchings of even cycles
Here is a bijective proof.
Label the vertices of $C_{2n}$ as $1, 2, \dots, n, 1', 2', \dots, n'$ in clockwise order and let $M$ be a matching of size $k<n$ in $C_{2n}$. Since $M$ is not a perfect mat …
10
votes
Accepted
Are all numbers from $1$ to $n!$ the number of perfect matchings of some bipartite graph?
No. For all $n \geq 3$, there is no $G \in \mathcal{G}_{2n}$ with $f(G)=n!-1$. To see this, note that $f(K_{n,n})=n!$ and $f(K_{n,n}-e)=n!-(n-1)!$, where $K_{n,n}-e$ is $K_{n,n}$ minus an edge. Thu …
15
votes
Are all almost regular graphs obvious?
Here is an expansion of joro's answer.
Claim.
$K_{n, n+1}$ is obvious if and only if $n+1$ is even.
Proof. If $n+1$ is even, we can add a perfect matching on the vertices on the right to obtain a …
3
votes
Maximum bipartite graph (1,n) "matching"
This problem seems pretty hard. Let $G$ be a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A,B)$. One easy case to consider is if each vertex in $A$ has degree $k$ and we seek a maximum $(1, k)$ matching. For …
5
votes
Accepted
Clutters with no maximum-size matchings
Yes, this is possible. For each prime $p$ and $c \in \{0,1, \dots, p-1\}$ let $A_{c,p}=\{c+kp \mid k \in \mathbb{Z}\}$. Clearly, the set of all $A_{c,p}$ is a clutter $\mathcal C$ with ground set $\ …