Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-Kan correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.
8
votes
1
answer
399
views
Freely adding degeneracies does not change the homotopy type
Background: Let $S$ be a simplicial set. By freely adding degeneracies to $S$, I mean first applying the forgetfull functor from simplicial sets to semi-simplicial sets which forget the already existi …
8
votes
1
answer
468
views
A model structure on semi-simplicial algebraic Kan complexes?
By an algebraic semi-simplicial kan complex I mean a semi-simplicial set (i.e. a presheaf on the category of finite ordered sets and injective order preserving maps), which is a Kan complex (in the se …
3
votes
A model structure on semi-simplicial algebraic Kan complexes?
I went back to this question a few days ago and found the solution: it is indeed a true model structure.
I have two (related) approaches to this, but anyway the key point is the semi-simplicial appro …
1
vote
Accepted
Does a homotopy sheaf functor commute with group completion
I'm still confused by the question when $n>0$: $\pi_n^{\tau} X $ are already groups, so applying the group completion functor do not do anything to them, and, even in the catagory of spaces, I have ne …
2
votes
Accepted
Does the monoidal structure on semisimplicial sets preserve fibrant objects?
It is not the case: the terminal semi-simplicial set $1$ is obviously fibrant but as I will show below the geometric product $1 \otimes 1$ is not fibrant.
1) What does $1 \otimes 1$ look like ?
So, $1 …
6
votes
Accepted
Cellularity of anodyne extensions?
I believe the following seem to be a very simple counterexample without it being related to Whitehead obstruction as suggested by Tyler Lawson.
Consider the simplicial sets $D$ freely generated by:
…
5
votes
1
answer
231
views
Hammock localization and free adjoints
The Hammock localization $L^H \mathcal{C}$ of a relative category $(\mathcal{C},\mathcal
{W})$ is a simplicial category defined by Dwyer and Kan as a way to compute the $\infty$-categorical localizat …
5
votes
Simplicial spaces internally to simplicial sets
This is a small clarification of Jens Hemelaer's answer, but it is essentially the same point: Internal locales in a presheaf category are actually very different from "presheaf of locales".
I'm denot …
11
votes
1
answer
683
views
Correspondences of $\infty$-categories
In Higher topos theory and Higher algebra Lurie defines (see section 2.3.1 of HTT) a correspondence between two $\infty$-categories $C$ and $D$ as being an $\infty$-category $\mathcal{M}$ over $\Delta …
14
votes
Why is Kan's $Ex^\infty$ functor useful?
Another thing for which Kan Ex$^{\infty}$ functor is useful is actually in the construction of the Kan-Quillen model structure. It morally gives a purely algebraic version of the simplicial approximat …
22
votes
Accepted
Is there a higher analog of "category with all same side inverses is a groupoid"?
Yes, this is possible. The following is a classical result of the theory of quasi-categories (You'll find it in the early part of Lurie's Higher topos theory or in Joyal notes on quasi-categories - w …
9
votes
Conservative cocompletion of categories of geometric shapes for homotopy theory
I don't really see a way to give a single answer here, these are 7 different questions (well actually a lot more than 7 if we count all the different flavours of cubes, and of the other ones, probably …