Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 22131
22 votes
Accepted

Why are operads sometimes better than algebraic theories?

Morphisms of operads correspond to weakly cartesian morphisms of monads. … The details of this have been worked out by Gepner, Haugseng and Kock in $\infty$-Operads as Analytic Monads. …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
17 votes
1 answer
563 views

A new (?) way of composing monads

By composition of monads, I mean given two monads $S$ and $T$, making their composite $S T$ into a monad. … I work in the cartesian monoidal category of Sets, so "monads" are just monoids (you can promote them to actual monads by looking at the endofunctor $X \times \_$ if you prefer). …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
11 votes
Accepted

Characterization of functors whose right adjoint is monadic?

Let $F: C \to D$ be a left adjoint functor. I hope I'm not saying anything stupid, but I think you can just rephrase the two conditions of Beck Monadicity theorem in terms of the left adjoint: The con …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
10 votes
0 answers
239 views

Colimits of algebras for $\infty$-Monad

Lurie is proving the existence of colimits in the special case of algebras for operads, but I don't think its proof can be extended to more general monads, but there might some things to be done... …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
9 votes

A new (?) way of composing monads

Ok, I think I've solved the mystery, and it is a little disappointing: The point is that there is actually a distributive law lurking in the background , constructed from the $l$ in the original quest …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
7 votes
1 answer
206 views

Algebras for products or limits of monads

the category of monads on $C$ to the category of endofunctor on $C$). … Is there some assumptions under which we can describe algebra for some limits of monads in terms of algebras for the individual monads ? …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
6 votes
1 answer
211 views

References requestion : Pretopos are algebras for a composed monad?

Unless I'm mistaken the "Free completion under finite limits monad" $C \mapsto C^{lex}$ and the "free co-completion monad" $C \mapsto \widehat{C}$ (the categories of small presheaves) satisfies a dist …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
6 votes
Accepted

Is the category of computads for a finitary monad on $n$-globular sets cocomplete?

I would consider this as a folklore results in the area, and I wouldn't be surprised if it is written somewhere, at least for the special case of the strict $\infty$-category monads, but I couldn't find …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
6 votes
Accepted

Are infinitary monads monadic?

which is also in $S$, then the category of monads that are in $S$ is monadic over $S$. … $\square$ So the all point of the question is to find nice class of endofunctor for which free monads construction are available. …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
3 votes

It's there a way to take a composite monad and a monad map to create a map of the composite?

So, having such a morphism doesn't help to make $QT$ or $SQ'$ into monads. To convince you of this, take $S$ to be the identity monad. … any monad $T$ and $Q$, you always have a (unique) distributive law $ST \to TS$ and a unique morphism of monad $S \to Q$, but when it comes to make $QT$ into a monad this is just two completely general monads
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
2 votes

What is the universal property of algebras for the codensity monad?

There is something in $Cat/B$ : $Alg(T) \to B$ is the universal monadic right adjoint through which $F$ factors. There's probably a cleaner way to see this, but here is how I think about it : It is ea …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k