Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with grothendieck-topology
Search options not deleted
user 2191
17
votes
Accepted
Voevodsky's Triangulated Categories of Motives and their Relationships
I'm not sure that it is possible to compress the big picture into one answer; yet I will try to give a hint.
Firstly, one can hardly hope to have a "reasonable" motivic $t$-structure for motives with …
- 30.3k
4
votes
0
answers
259
views
Can one construct Freyd-Mitchell's embeddings that respect sheafifications?
For a certain presheaf $P$ with values in an abelian category $A$ satisfying AB5 and its sheafification $S$ (with respect to a small Grothendieck site) I would like to prove: $S(f):S(X)\to S(Y)$ is a …
CommunityBot
- 1
2
votes
0
answers
354
views
What are the easiest cases of base change (for sheaves on sites)?
I have a closed embedding of schemes $i:X'\to X$, and for each of them I consider three Grothendieck topologies for the category of the corresponding (relatively) \'etale schemes: the \'etale one, the …
- 16.9k
3
votes
Grothendieck topologies, Mayer-Vietoris, and points
You definition of a cohomology theory is rather strange since it does not seem to depend on the choice of the site (it corresponds to Zariski topology).
For the correct definition of cohomology theo …
- 16.9k