Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 1946

An ordinal is the order type of a well-ordered set. The first few ordinals are $0, 1, 2, \dots, \omega, \omega+1, \dots$ where $\omega$ is the order type of $\mathbb{N}$, and $\omega+1$ is the order type of $\mathbb{N}$ together with a maximum element.

3 votes

Finite Number of Registers and Computable Well-Orderings

Unfortunately, I don't fully understand your question, concerning the registers. But it seems that part of what is at stake is to find a computable relation on the natural numbers having order-type …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

Confusion regarding the requirements for a recursive ordinal notation

The subset of natural numbers referred to is essentially the set of notations, encoded as natural numbers. In your example, it is the set of numbers having form $2^n$ or $2^n\cdot 3$. The ordinal nota …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Are two recursive well-orderings with the same order type recursively isomorphic?

The answer is no, not even for relations with order type $\omega$, and not even for primitive recursive relations. To see this, let $\leq$ be the usual order relation on the natural numbers. And let …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
14 votes
Accepted

Cardinality of $\omega\uparrow^\omega\omega$

The Knuth arrow notation is most often defined only on the natural numbers, but the central idea of it can be easily extended to the ordinals, for example as follows: $$\alpha\uparrow^0\beta=\alpha\b …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
2 votes

Ordinal vs. cardinal dimension

One natural context where one thinks of the exponent or dimension in the space as having an order is with the function space $\kappa^\lambda$ considered under the relation of eventual domination. That …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
1 vote

A few questions about Tychonoff plank

To see that $S$ is countably compact, suppose that we have a countable open cover $\mathcal{U}$. Notice that $S$ is the union of the nested chain of subspaces $$(\omega_1+1)\times (\alpha+1)\cup (\alp …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

Embedding large countable ordinals into the complex plane

Yes, in fact every countable ordinal embeds into the rational numbers in this way, an order-preserving map as a closed set of rational numbers. Let me give three proofs. First, one can easily prove th …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

An ordinal not $\Sigma_1$ stable in alpha must be in the hull of smaller parameters in $L_\a...

Since $\beta$ is not $\Sigma_1$-stable in $\alpha$, there is some new $\Sigma_1$ fact $\exists\xi\varphi(\xi,\vec a)$ true in $L_\alpha$ but not in $L_\beta$, for some $\vec a\in L_\beta$. It follows …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
7 votes

Who wins infinite Hex?

This doesn't answer the question that was asked, but rather an alternative kind of infinite Hex, played on the infinite hexagonal lattice board as shown below. I am posting it because people intereste …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
19 votes

What is the idea behind stationary sets?

One answer to your question about intuition is simply that stationary sets arise very naturally once you begin to think of the natural measure surrounding club sets. The stationary sets are simply tho …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Restriction of a locally finitely supported function on an ordinal is finitely supported?

If the function has infinitely many nonzero values below some ordinal $\alpha$, let $\beta$ be the supremum of the locations of the first $\omega$ many instances. So $\beta\leq\alpha$ and every neighb …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
6 votes

First-order definable bijection between $P(On)$ (or $No$) and $V$? (Is this equivalent to $V...

$\newcommand\Ord{\text{Ord}}\newcommand\HOD{\text{HOD}}$Let me point out that the existence of a definable bijection of $V$ with $P(\Ord)$ is equivalent to the assertion that the universe is Leibnizia …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
12 votes

Ramsey Theorem for the class ORD

Ali Enayat and I have proved that with respect to definable classes, Ord is NOT weakly compact. In particular, we show, in every model of ZFC, there is a definable Ord-tree with no definable cofina …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
14 votes
Accepted

What is the least ordinal than cannot be embedded in $\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{R}$?

Let me get things started with some simple observations. Note that given any countable sequence of functions $f_n$, we can by diagonalization construct a function eventually dominating all of them, $ …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Large cardinals disproving J=L

Unfortunately, your question seems to be based on a misunderstanding of the $J$ hierarchy. There is no such large cardinal hypothesis. The reason is that already ZFC and indeed much weaker theories s …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar

15 30 50 per page