Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
0
votes
Is there any name in the literature of functions satisfying this order property?
There is a related usage in set theory in the context of Fodor's lemma, where we often consider functions $f$ on the ordinals with the property that $f(\alpha)<\alpha$. These are called the regressive …
3
votes
name for a subset of a binary relational structure which is "closed downward"?
I don't see any reason not to use the same terminology as one uses in the case of a partial order (or a pre-order), since a set $S$ is closed in your sense with respect a relation if and only if it is …
1
vote
Terminology: Lexicographical order
The lexical order of a well ordered list of orders $\langle X_\alpha,\leq_\alpha\rangle$ is the order on the product space $\Pi_\alpha X_\alpha$ placing $s$ before $t$ if $s_\alpha\lt_\alpha t_\alpha$ …
8
votes
Which ordinals can be embedded into an ordered field?
Let me address merely the suggestion the OP makes in the comment: whether this ordinal can be specified from the cofinality of the field.
The answer is no, because any ordered field $F$ can be eleme …
3
votes
Existentially closed partial orders
A model $M$ of a theory $T$ is existentially closed with respect
to that theory, if for any quantifier-free formula $\varphi$ and
any objects $\vec a$ in $M$, if there is model $N$ of the theory
$T$ e …
3
votes
Order-preserving image of a complete lattice
No, clearly not, because you could put junk on top.
But even if you avoid this by insisting that the map is surjective, there are counterexamples. Consider the map of Eric Wofsey's recent answer, wh …
5
votes
Accepted
Is $\mathcal{P}(\omega)/fin$ with the interval topology a connected space?
The answer is yes, because any two nonempty open sets have points
in common. And this also shows directly that the space is not
Hausdorff.
From what you describe in the other question, the topology i …
1
vote
Does every locally finite acyclic directed set embed into a linear order locally isomorphic ...
$\newcommand{\P}{\mathbb{P}}
\newcommand{\L}{\mathbb{L}}
\newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}}$
The answer is yes, and you don't need the locally finite hypothesis. Also, you may assume that the embedding is …
3
votes
Accepted
Semitransitive relations
One natural example would be the complete bipartite digraphs, which are all semi-transitive but (if nontrivial) are not transitive.
A complete bipartite digraph is a digraph whose vertices partition …
6
votes
Accepted
Uncountable orderings
If every initial segment of the order has only countably many predecessors, then every countable subset of the order would be bounded (for otherwise the whole order would be a countable union of count …
10
votes
Accepted
Cardinality of group of order-preserving functions from R to R
Such a function can have only countably many points of discontinuity, since any discontinuity will be a jump discontinuity and hence the range will skip over an interval unique to that point, and so w …
3
votes
Order (a,b) ≤ (a',b') iff b ≤ a' or (b' = b and a ≤ a') where a≤b and a'≤b'
If the ambient order is a lattice, they your order is indeed a lattice order. To see this, suppose that we have intervals (a,b) and (a',b'), in your sense that $a\le b$ and $a'\le b'$. If $b\lt b'$, t …
2
votes
Accepted
Power of an order relation
If $R$ and $S$ are binary relations, then the composition relation $R\circ S$ is usually defined by $a\mathrel{R\circ S} c$ if and only if there is $b$ such that $a\mathrel{R}b$ and $b\mathrel{S}c$.
…
6
votes
Accepted
Filter-closed vs. chain-closed
Indeed, your conjecture is correct.
Theorem. If L is a complete lattice and S is a subset of L, then S is chain-closed iff S is filter-closed.
Proof. Clearly filter-closed implies chain-closed, sin …
4
votes
Definition of $\beta$-limit ordinals
If one replaces the cofinality $\omega$ requirement by an arbitrary cofinality (and if one also insists that $\alpha_m\lt\alpha$, as seems intended), then the construction is the same as that of the C …