Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 1946

Mathematical logic, Set theory, Peano arithmetic, Model theory, Proof theory, Recursion theory, Computability theory, Univalent foundations, Reverse mathematics, Frege foundation of arithmetic, Goedel's incompleteness and Mathematics, Structural set theory, Category theory, Type theory.

4 votes
Accepted

What do you call the generalisation of the direct image?

This idea is commonly used in set theory with atoms. I'm not sure whether it has a standard name, but I would be inclined to call it the natural extension of $f$ to sets. There is no need to stop the …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

Meta-undecidability

One can never prove in ZFC itself that a given statement is independent of ZFC, because the assertion "$S$ is independent of ZFC" implies Con(ZFC), since every statement is settled by an inconsistent …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
10 votes
Accepted

Dedekind's theorem

Regarding the narrower interpretation of your question, the fact that the finite numbers are not equinumerous with any proper subset is also expressed as the classical pigeon hole principle. And for t …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Original proof of Gödel's completeness theorem compared to Henkin's proof

With regard to the amount of set theory required to prove the completeness theorem, the wikipedia page on The completeness theorem asserts: When considered over a countable language, the comp …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
9 votes
Accepted

Why not $\sf ZFC+[V=HOD]$?

What does it mean to be a "standard" theory? By any account, the theory ZFC + V=HOD already is one of the "standard" theories. The axiom V=HOD is intensely studied by set theorists; it appears as a hy …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
12 votes

Do set theorists work in T?

You address your question to set theorists, and so let me answer as a set theorist that, yes, when I think purely as a set theorist, then indeed the idea that every object is a set just goes without s …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
5 votes

weakening naive comprehension to avoid the paradoxes

I'm not clear on why you don't regard ZFC as an example. You say: Weakening the axiom of naive comprehension has not been a popular way of escaping from the set-theoretic paradoxes because n …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
13 votes
Accepted

Concrete models of abstract structures

I take your question to be about what we might call the structuralist perspective, the view that we specify mathematical objects and structures by their defining structural features, ignoring any inte …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
5 votes

Are inference laws consistent?

A somewhat stronger property than mere consistency, which is universally desired in a proof system, is the property of soundness. A formal system is sound, if whenever it proves a statement $\varphi …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
13 votes
Accepted

Ultimate Maximality Principle

There are several maximality principles that already have some of this flavor, with a growing literature surrounding them. For example, the maximality principle MP as introduced in my paper A simple …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
10 votes
Accepted

Set-theoretical multiverse and foundations

(It happens that I will be giving a talk this week on this topic at the Exploring the Frontiers of Incompleteness series at Harvard, which is focussing on the question of determinism in set theory. Th …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
4 votes

Resource request on "$\in$-homomorphisms" in Set Theory

I believe that you may have misstated the definition of what it means to be an $\in$-homomorphism. (I couldn't find your notion in Jech at your links — have I missed it?) For example, with your defini …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
32 votes
Accepted

How much of the axiom of choice do you need in mathematics?

Your hypothesis is in a sense stronger than just assuming ZFC outright. Namely, if we have $\lambda$-DC for some inaccessible cardinal $\lambda$, and ZF in the background, then in particular, we will …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
16 votes
Accepted

Propositional calculus, first order theories, models, completeness

Unfortunately I don't quite agree with your summary. First, in the context of propositional logic, the relevant notion of model is simply a row of the truth table, a propositional world, a valuation a …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
5 votes
Accepted

Is this form of replacement suitable for ZF - Powerset + well-ordering principle?

The answer is no. Your version of replacement is a weakening of ordinary replacement. To see this assume that replacement holds (but perhaps not power set or collection), and then observe that for any …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar

15 30 50 per page