Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 1946

Enriched categories, topoi, abelian categories, monoidal categories, homological algebra.

7 votes

Hereditarily countable sets in Antifounded ZF

Update. This answer does not answer the question that was asked, since Jech is using what had seemed to me as an idiosyncratic definition of hereditary countable. But upon reflection, I find his defin …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
17 votes

Are there substantive differences between the different approaches to "size issues" in categ...

Although people often talk as though it just doesn't matter which approach you use — perhaps all universes are alike? Let me prove that in a strict sense this is not true. The nature of the mathematic …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
22 votes
Accepted

Does $\mathbf{Cat}$ have the Cantor–Schröder–Bernstein property?

One can take some of the standard violations of CSB with other kinds of mathematical structures and transfer them to categories. For example, with linear orders, we have the two linear orders $$\langl …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
22 votes

Do bijections from the natural numbers satisfy the Peano axioms?

The main lesson is that it doesn't matter at all which particular objects you take as the numbers and what function you use as the successor function, as long as your system fulfills the right structu …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Ultraproducts in the category of structures and elementary embeddings

Since you asked about ultraproducts, and not ultrapowers, let me argue that the answer must be negative. The reason is that the category of $L$-structures under elementary embeddings is partitioned in …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
23 votes
Accepted

Are the categories of sets, abelian groups, and commutative rings unique?

Introduction to pluralism A version of this question lies at the heart of the ongoing dispute on pluralism in the philosophy of mathematics. Is there at bottom just one mathematical reality? Does ever …
8 votes

In between classes and conglomerates

First of all, in ZFC set theory one cannot prove all proper classes have the same size, and consequently it is not fully sensible to refer to "the size of a proper class," since they can have differen …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Is the category of atomless Boolean algebras with complete embeddings closed under coproducts?

This category does not have co-products. To see this, let $\newcommand\B{\mathbb{B}}\B$ be any atomless complete Boolean algebra with a nontrivial automorphism $\pi:\B\to\B$. For example, the forcing …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
6 votes

How much Replacement does this axiom provide?

The principle is essentially asserting that $\aleph_\alpha$ exists for every ordinal $\alpha$. More precisely, it asserts that for every well-order type $\alpha$, there is a set of cardinality $\aleph …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
86 votes

Has incorrect notation ever led to a mistaken proof?

Here is an example from set theory. Set theorists commonly study not only the theory $\newcommand\ZFC{\text{ZFC}}\ZFC$ and its models, but also various fragments of this theory, such as the theory o …
8 votes
Accepted

Set-theoretical multiverses and their representation as functors? Why *the* multiverse?

Of course we have been investigating a wide variety of multiverse concepts, and in this sense, yes, we have not just one, but many, multiverses. But to be sure, much of this multiverse analysis has b …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
11 votes
Accepted

Which large cardinals have a Matryoshka characterization?

It seems to me that the Berkeley cardinals can be thought of in line with your Matryoshka analogy. Namely, a cardinal $\kappa$ is Berkeley, if for every transitive set containing $\kappa$ there is an …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
4 votes

Is there a universal way to force the Axiom of Choice to be true?

Following up on my remarks in the comments, allow me to answer from the perspective of model-theoretic interpretations of theories. I view interpretations of theories as providing particularly strong …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Internal operations on uncomputable functions

The jump inversion theorem (Friedburg 1957) shows that any Turing degree $d$ above the halting problem is the jump of another degree $d=b'$, which means that $d$ is Turing equivalent to the halting pr …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
24 votes
Accepted

Large categories vs. $\mathrm{U}$-categories: why is the loss of category-theoretic informat...

Let me try to answer as a set theorist, rather than as a category theorist, since I think that your question concerns at bottom a matter often considered in set theory. Namely, the essence of your qu …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar

15 30 50 per page