Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with cohomology
Search options not deleted
user 161009
A branch of algebraic topology concerning the study of cocycles and coboundaries. It is in some sense a dual theory to homology theory. This tag can be further specialized by using it in conjunction with the tags group-cohomology, etale-cohomology, sheaf-cohomology, galois-cohomology, lie-algebra-cohomology, motivic-cohomology, equivariant-cohomology, ...
5
votes
1
answer
252
views
Operadic cohomology in terms of infinitesimal composition
Given a non symmetric operad $\mathcal{O}$, is there an explicit description of its (André-Quillen or other) cohomology in low degrees in terms of infinitesimal composition? … I ask because I am interested in a collection parametrised by objects that are 2-cocycles in the Hochschild cohomology of the following algebra with coefficients in an appropriate bimodule. …
- 518
6
votes
1
answer
353
views
Comparing Hochschild (co)homology for algebras and coalgebras
Given a field $k$, an associative $k$-algebra $A$, and an $A$-bimodule $M$, one can define as the Hochschild homology and cohomology as the homology of the complexes
$$M\otimes A^{\otimes n}$$
and
$$\text …
- 518
2
votes
Comparing Hochschild (co)homology for algebras and coalgebras
Denote by $HH_n$ and $CH_n$ the Hochschild homology of an algebra and a coalgebra respectively, and similarly for cohomology. …
- 518
4
votes
1
answer
397
views
Reference for isomorphism between group cohomology and singular cohomology
It is a fairly standard result that
$$ H^i(G, L) \cong H^i(X,\mathcal{L})$$
where the left hand side is the group cohomology and the right hand side is sheaf cohomology. …
- 518