Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with equivariant-cohomology
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 14447
6
votes
Reading list for Equivariant Cohomology
I would like to point out that the term "equivariant cohomology'' is ambiguous. To those unfamiliar with modern algebraic topology, it means Borel cohomology, the cohomology theory that is the subjec …
- 30.4k
4
votes
$RO(G)$-graded homotopy groups vs. Mackey functors
A. The brackets are the same computed in any model, as you say, and for most that entails
fibrant approximation. For genuine $G$-spectra (complete universe), $G$ a compact
Lie group, it goes back …
- 30.4k
0
votes
Mackey(also Green and Tambara) functors and Greenlees-May
That is not what one expects from analogy with simpler structures. It would be of interest is to compute the ``box product'' $RV\Box RW$ in terms of the additive description of Mackey functors that …
- 30.4k
14
votes
Accepted
Mackey(also Green and Tambara) functors and Greenlees-May
I thank you for the careful reading and apologize for the concision. This is a downwards induction on the size of subgroups. Using the explicit description of the $RV$ given top of page 239 and the
c …
- 30.4k
4
votes
Simple Equivariant homology [no borel-Moore]
I'm afraid this is not an easy subject to get into. There is no
problem defining Bredon homology. Maybe first in print in a 1975
memoir of Soren Illman. A more recent summary is in my ``Equivariant …
- 30.4k