Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with lo.logic
Search options not deleted
user 1306
first-order and higher-order logic, model theory, set theory, proof theory, computability theory, formal languages, definability, interplay of syntax and semantics, constructive logic, intuitionism, philosophical logic, modal logic, completeness, Gödel incompleteness, decidability, undecidability, theories of truth, truth revision, consistency.
3
votes
Non-Formal Applications: Higman and Kruskal
Unsurprisingly, there are various ways in which Higman's lemma is used in the context of Gröbner bases. One interesting recent example : http://www.msri.org/people/members/chillar/files/HS-MonoidGBFin …
- 16.9k
43
votes
Accepted
Is there a natural bijection from $\mathbb{N}$ to $\mathbb{Q}$?
There is a following result which is quite lovely, I think (I don't remember right away whose result this is):
Let us define a function $f\colon\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{Q}^+$ as follows: $f(1)=1$, and al …
- 16.9k
11
votes
Higher categories in logic
To elaborate on Peter Arndt's answer a bit: indeed, considering terms as 1-cells and rewriting rules as 2-cells, you can indeed obtain a rather productive higher categorical view on various constructi …
- 16.9k