Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with gn.general-topology
Search options not deleted
user 1198
Continuum theory, point-set topology, spaces with algebraic structure, foundations, dimension theory, local and global properties.
1
vote
What are the topological properties of the metric space retained (inherited) for its completion
I was going to suggest that all the connectivity properties were either preserved or sometimes acquired by completion: e.g. a totally disconnected $X$ may become a path-connected $\bar X$, and the sam …
2
votes
Freeing a sphere from within a sphere
Edit: This is meant to answer the question of why we can't have an embedding $\mathbb S^{n-1}\times I\hookrightarrow\mathbb R^n$ such that the boundary is two side-by-side spheres rather than two nest …
- 2,018
17
votes
understanding Steenrod squares
I second the references to Hatcher and to Mosher & Tangora, though you can also find Steenrod's original paper. At least the first two of those start out by listing the various axioms of Steenrod squ …
- 2,018
15
votes
Finite Hausdorff spaces
Yes. Better, it works for $T_1$, too: $T_1$ is the axiom that one-point sets are closed.
Then since the set is finite, the complement of any point is also closed; the point is open. That's the discr …
- 2,018