Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with terminology
Search options not deleted
user 11640
Questions of the kind "What's the name for a X that satisfies property Y?"
10
votes
Accepted
Direct and inverse image terminology
There is a precise, almost literal, sense in which $f^* : \textbf{Sh} (Y) \to \textbf{Sh} (X)$ generalises the inverse image as defined in elementary set theory.
Observe that open subspaces $V \subset …
- 15.9k
6
votes
Slice-category-like terminology question
$\mathcal{C}'$ is isomorphic to a functor category, namely the category of functors $\mathbb{B} \mathbb{N} \to \mathcal{C}$, where $\mathbb{B} \mathbb{N}$ is the category freely generated by an endomo …
- 15.9k
1
vote
Accepted
Is there a name for this "weak compatibility" between Grothendieck (pre)topologies?
I would just say that the inclusion preserves covering families (in the naïve sense). You don't need Grothendieck pretopologies to make sense of this – just plain coverages (in the sense of Johnstone; …
- 15.9k