Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with hecke-operators
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 116092
3
votes
0
answers
290
views
Ramanujan conjecture in terms of representations
Given an automorphic representation, I would like to bound $\alpha_1^\nu(p) + \alpha_2^\nu(p)$ where the $\alpha_i$ are the Satake parameters of an automorphic form $f$ of, say, $GL_2$. So that $\alph …
- 609
6
votes
0
answers
246
views
Local L-factors for automorphic representations
For Hecke L-functions associated to a holomorphic cusp form $f$ of level $N$, the local factors can be decomposed into
$$L_p(s, f) = (1-\lambda_f(p)p^{-s} + \chi_N(p)p^{-2s})^{-1}$$
where $\chi_N$ is …
- 609
23
votes
2
answers
2k
views
What is the matter with Hecke operators?
This question is inspired by some others on MathOverflow. Hecke operators are standardly defined by double cosets acting on automorphic forms, in an explicit way.
However, what bother me is that Hec …
- 609