Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Prime numbers, diophantine equations, diophantine approximations, analytic or algebraic number theory, arithmetic geometry, Galois theory, transcendental number theory, continued fractions
4
votes
Non-vanishing of zeta(s), Re(s)=1, without complex analysis?
You might want to look at the paper "Le théorème des nombres premiers et la transformation de Fourier" by Jean-Benoît Bost, available at https://www.cmls.polytechnique.fr/xups/xups02-01.pdf
It gives a …
5
votes
Prime Number Theorem w/o Complex Analysis
A nice exposition of an Erdos/Selberg-type elementary proof is given by Levinson in Amer. Math. Monthly 76 (1969) 225–245.
The proof by Daboussi as written up by Tenenbaum and Mendes-France was alr …