Skip to main content
3 of 6
clarification that the question was updated after Jiang's comment
Sebastien Palcoux
  • 27k
  • 5
  • 74
  • 186

Abstract characterization of group von Neumann algebra (II1 factor)

The group von Neumann algebra $LG$ is a factor if and only if the group $G$ is ICC (i.e. infinite conjugacy class property). Moreover if $G$ is nontrivial then $LG$ is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor.

The initial question is to ask whether every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor is of this form (Problem 4.4.10 in this book of S. Sakai, 1971). A. Connes answered negatively in this paper (1975) by building a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is not anti-isomorphic to itself (whereas $LG$ is so). This leads to ask whether every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor anti-isomorphic to itself is of that form. V. Jones answered negatively in this paper (1980) by building a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is anti-isomorphic to itself but without involutory antiautomorphisms (whereas $LG$ has so). Then:

Question: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (after Jiang's comment): No, A. Ioana built in this paper (2010) $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors $M$ whose amplifications $M^t$ (with $t \neq 1$) admit an involutory antiautomorphism but are not group von Neumann algebras, see Corollary F, Corollary 10.1 and Remark 10.3. Then:

Updated question: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism of the form $(LG)^t$?

In other words: Does a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism admit an amplification which is a group von Neumann algebra? If not, it there still an abstract characterization of such $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors?

The initial question and then Connes' paper were pointed out to me by Keshab Chandra Bakshi.

Sebastien Palcoux
  • 27k
  • 5
  • 74
  • 186