Skip to main content
If A=C the action is not free.
Source Link
Sebastien Palcoux
  • 27k
  • 5
  • 74
  • 186

The group von Neumann algebra $L\Gamma$ is a factor if and only if the group $\Gamma$ is ICC (i.e. infinite conjugacy class property). Moreover if $\Gamma$ is nontrivial then $L\Gamma$ is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor.

Question 0.1 (Sakai, Problem 4.4.10 here, 1971): Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Connes here, 1975): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is not anti-isomorphic to itself (whereas $L\Gamma$ is so).

Question 0.2: Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor anti-isomorphic to itself a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Jones, here, 1980): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is anti-isomorphic to itself but without involutory antiautomorphisms (whereas $L\Gamma$ has so).

The answers for the next two questions were pointed out by Jiang's comments.

Question 0.3 (Remark 5.7 in previous paper): Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Ioana here, 2010): No, because there are $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors $M$ whose amplifications $M^t$ (with $t \neq 1$) admit an involutory antiautomorphism but are not group von Neumann algebras (see Corollary F, Corollary 10.1 and Remark 10.3).

Question 0.4: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomormphic to a group von Neumann algebra (i.e. of the form $(L\Gamma)^t$)?
Answer (Boutonnet here, 2013): No, because there are crossed product von Neumann algebra $L^{\infty}(X,\mu) \rtimes_{\sigma} \Gamma$, with $σ$ a free ergodic pmp-action of an ICC group $Γ$ on a probability space $(X,μ)$, which are not stably isomorphic to a group von Neumann algebra.

Question: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomorphic to a crossed product $A \rtimes G$, with $A$ an abelian von Neumann algebra and $G$ a group?

Recall that if the action of the group $G$ on the abelian von Neumann algebra $A$ is just $\mathbb{C}$ then $A \rtimes G = LG$. If the action of $G$ on $A$ is free then $A \rtimes G$ is a factor iff the action is ergodic. Now, note that $A \rtimes G$ could alsocan be a factor without the action being free, for example when $A = \mathbb{C}$, because then $A \rtimes G = LG$.

Remark: The existence of a Kac algebra generating a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor not stably isomorphic to any $A⋊G$ (as above) would be very interesting.

The initial question and then Connes' paper were pointed out to me by Keshab Chandra Bakshi.

The group von Neumann algebra $L\Gamma$ is a factor if and only if the group $\Gamma$ is ICC (i.e. infinite conjugacy class property). Moreover if $\Gamma$ is nontrivial then $L\Gamma$ is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor.

Question 0.1 (Sakai, Problem 4.4.10 here, 1971): Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Connes here, 1975): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is not anti-isomorphic to itself (whereas $L\Gamma$ is so).

Question 0.2: Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor anti-isomorphic to itself a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Jones, here, 1980): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is anti-isomorphic to itself but without involutory antiautomorphisms (whereas $L\Gamma$ has so).

The answers for the next two questions were pointed out by Jiang's comments.

Question 0.3 (Remark 5.7 in previous paper): Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Ioana here, 2010): No, because there are $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors $M$ whose amplifications $M^t$ (with $t \neq 1$) admit an involutory antiautomorphism but are not group von Neumann algebras (see Corollary F, Corollary 10.1 and Remark 10.3).

Question 0.4: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomormphic to a group von Neumann algebra (i.e. of the form $(L\Gamma)^t$)?
Answer (Boutonnet here, 2013): No, because there are crossed product von Neumann algebra $L^{\infty}(X,\mu) \rtimes_{\sigma} \Gamma$, with $σ$ a free ergodic pmp-action of an ICC group $Γ$ on a probability space $(X,μ)$, which are not stably isomorphic to a group von Neumann algebra.

Question: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomorphic to a crossed product $A \rtimes G$, with $A$ an abelian von Neumann algebra and $G$ a group?

Recall that if the abelian von Neumann algebra $A$ is just $\mathbb{C}$ then $A \rtimes G = LG$. If the action of $G$ on $A$ is free then $A \rtimes G$ is a factor iff the action is ergodic. Now, note that $A \rtimes G$ could also be a factor without the action being free.

Remark: The existence of a Kac algebra generating a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor not stably isomorphic to any $A⋊G$ (as above) would be very interesting.

The initial question and then Connes' paper were pointed out to me by Keshab Chandra Bakshi.

The group von Neumann algebra $L\Gamma$ is a factor if and only if the group $\Gamma$ is ICC (i.e. infinite conjugacy class property). Moreover if $\Gamma$ is nontrivial then $L\Gamma$ is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor.

Question 0.1 (Sakai, Problem 4.4.10 here, 1971): Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Connes here, 1975): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is not anti-isomorphic to itself (whereas $L\Gamma$ is so).

Question 0.2: Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor anti-isomorphic to itself a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Jones, here, 1980): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is anti-isomorphic to itself but without involutory antiautomorphisms (whereas $L\Gamma$ has so).

The answers for the next two questions were pointed out by Jiang's comments.

Question 0.3 (Remark 5.7 in previous paper): Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Ioana here, 2010): No, because there are $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors $M$ whose amplifications $M^t$ (with $t \neq 1$) admit an involutory antiautomorphism but are not group von Neumann algebras (see Corollary F, Corollary 10.1 and Remark 10.3).

Question 0.4: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomormphic to a group von Neumann algebra (i.e. of the form $(L\Gamma)^t$)?
Answer (Boutonnet here, 2013): No, because there are crossed product von Neumann algebra $L^{\infty}(X,\mu) \rtimes_{\sigma} \Gamma$, with $σ$ a free ergodic pmp-action of an ICC group $Γ$ on a probability space $(X,μ)$, which are not stably isomorphic to a group von Neumann algebra.

Question: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomorphic to a crossed product $A \rtimes G$, with $A$ an abelian von Neumann algebra and $G$ a group?

Recall that if the action of the group $G$ on the abelian von Neumann algebra $A$ is free then $A \rtimes G$ is a factor iff the action is ergodic. Now $A \rtimes G$ can be a factor without the action being free, for example when $A = \mathbb{C}$, because then $A \rtimes G = LG$.

Remark: The existence of a Kac algebra generating a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor not stably isomorphic to any $A⋊G$ (as above) would be very interesting.

The initial question and then Connes' paper were pointed out to me by Keshab Chandra Bakshi.

Simplification of the question
Source Link
Sebastien Palcoux
  • 27k
  • 5
  • 74
  • 186

The group von Neumann algebra $L\Gamma$ is a factor if and only if the group $\Gamma$ is ICC (i.e. infinite conjugacy class property). Moreover if $\Gamma$ is nontrivial then $L\Gamma$ is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor.

Question 0.1 (Sakai, Problem 4.4.10 here, 1971): Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Connes here, 1975): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is not anti-isomorphic to itself (whereas $L\Gamma$ is so).

Question 0.2: Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor anti-isomorphic to itself a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Jones, here, 1980): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is anti-isomorphic to itself but without involutory antiautomorphisms (whereas $L\Gamma$ has so).

The answers for the next two questions were pointed out by Jiang's comments.

Question 0.3 (Remark 5.7 in previous paper): Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Ioana here, 2010): No, because there are $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors $M$ whose amplifications $M^t$ (with $t \neq 1$) admit an involutory antiautomorphism but are not group von Neumann algebras (see Corollary F, Corollary 10.1 and Remark 10.3).

Question 0.4: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomormphic to a group von Neumann algebra (i.e. of the form $(L\Gamma)^t$)?
Answer (Boutonnet here, 2013): No, because there are crossed product von Neumann algebra $L^{\infty}(X,\mu) \rtimes_{\sigma} \Gamma$, with $σ$ a free ergodic pmp-action of an ICC group $Γ$ on a probability space $(X,μ)$, which are not stably isomorphic to a group von Neumann algebra.

Question: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomorphic to a group von Neumann algebra $L \Gamma$ or a crossed product $L^{\infty}(X,\mu) \rtimes_{\sigma} \Gamma$ (as above)?
[if not, more generally$A \rtimes G$, stably isomorphic to $A⋊Γ$ with $A$ an abelian von Neumann algebra and $G$ a group?]

Recall that if the abelian von Neumann algebra $A$ is just $\mathbb{C}$ then $A \rtimes G = LG$. If the action of $G$ on $A$ is free then $A \rtimes G$ is a factor iff the action is ergodic. Now, note that $A \rtimes G$ could also be a factor without the action being free.

Remark: The existence of a Kac algebra generating a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor not stably isomorphic to any $A⋊Γ$$A⋊G$ (as above) would be very interesting.

The initial question and then Connes' paper were pointed out to me by Keshab Chandra Bakshi.

The group von Neumann algebra $L\Gamma$ is a factor if and only if the group $\Gamma$ is ICC (i.e. infinite conjugacy class property). Moreover if $\Gamma$ is nontrivial then $L\Gamma$ is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor.

Question 0.1 (Sakai, Problem 4.4.10 here, 1971): Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Connes here, 1975): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is not anti-isomorphic to itself (whereas $L\Gamma$ is so).

Question 0.2: Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor anti-isomorphic to itself a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Jones, here, 1980): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is anti-isomorphic to itself but without involutory antiautomorphisms (whereas $L\Gamma$ has so).

The answers for the next two questions were pointed out by Jiang's comments.

Question 0.3 (Remark 5.7 in previous paper): Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Ioana here, 2010): No, because there are $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors $M$ whose amplifications $M^t$ (with $t \neq 1$) admit an involutory antiautomorphism but are not group von Neumann algebras (see Corollary F, Corollary 10.1 and Remark 10.3).

Question 0.4: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomormphic to a group von Neumann algebra (i.e. of the form $(L\Gamma)^t$)?
Answer (Boutonnet here, 2013): No, because there are crossed product von Neumann algebra $L^{\infty}(X,\mu) \rtimes_{\sigma} \Gamma$, with $σ$ a pmp-action of an ICC group $Γ$ on a probability space $(X,μ)$, which are not stably isomorphic to a group von Neumann algebra.

Question: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomorphic to a group von Neumann algebra $L \Gamma$ or a crossed product $L^{\infty}(X,\mu) \rtimes_{\sigma} \Gamma$ (as above)?
[if not, more generally, stably isomorphic to $A⋊Γ$ with $A$ an abelian von Neumann algebra?]

Remark: The existence of a Kac algebra generating a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor not stably isomorphic to any $A⋊Γ$ (as above) would be very interesting.

The initial question and then Connes' paper were pointed out to me by Keshab Chandra Bakshi.

The group von Neumann algebra $L\Gamma$ is a factor if and only if the group $\Gamma$ is ICC (i.e. infinite conjugacy class property). Moreover if $\Gamma$ is nontrivial then $L\Gamma$ is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor.

Question 0.1 (Sakai, Problem 4.4.10 here, 1971): Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Connes here, 1975): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is not anti-isomorphic to itself (whereas $L\Gamma$ is so).

Question 0.2: Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor anti-isomorphic to itself a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Jones, here, 1980): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is anti-isomorphic to itself but without involutory antiautomorphisms (whereas $L\Gamma$ has so).

The answers for the next two questions were pointed out by Jiang's comments.

Question 0.3 (Remark 5.7 in previous paper): Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Ioana here, 2010): No, because there are $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors $M$ whose amplifications $M^t$ (with $t \neq 1$) admit an involutory antiautomorphism but are not group von Neumann algebras (see Corollary F, Corollary 10.1 and Remark 10.3).

Question 0.4: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomormphic to a group von Neumann algebra (i.e. of the form $(L\Gamma)^t$)?
Answer (Boutonnet here, 2013): No, because there are crossed product von Neumann algebra $L^{\infty}(X,\mu) \rtimes_{\sigma} \Gamma$, with $σ$ a free ergodic pmp-action of an ICC group $Γ$ on a probability space $(X,μ)$, which are not stably isomorphic to a group von Neumann algebra.

Question: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomorphic to a crossed product $A \rtimes G$, with $A$ an abelian von Neumann algebra and $G$ a group?

Recall that if the abelian von Neumann algebra $A$ is just $\mathbb{C}$ then $A \rtimes G = LG$. If the action of $G$ on $A$ is free then $A \rtimes G$ is a factor iff the action is ergodic. Now, note that $A \rtimes G$ could also be a factor without the action being free.

Remark: The existence of a Kac algebra generating a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor not stably isomorphic to any $A⋊G$ (as above) would be very interesting.

The initial question and then Connes' paper were pointed out to me by Keshab Chandra Bakshi.

update again using Jiang comments
Source Link
Sebastien Palcoux
  • 27k
  • 5
  • 74
  • 186

The group von Neumann algebra $LG$$L\Gamma$ is a factor if and only if the group $G$$\Gamma$ is ICC (i.e. infinite conjugacy class property). Moreover if $G$$\Gamma$ is nontrivial then $LG$$L\Gamma$ is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor.

The initial question is to ask whether every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor is of this formQuestion 0.1 (ProblemSakai, Problem 4.4.10 in this bookhere of S. Sakai, 1971). A. Connes answered negatively in: Is every this paper$\mathrm{II}_1$ factor a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (1975Connes here, 1975) by building: No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is not anti-isomorphic to itself (whereas $LG$$L\Gamma$ is so). This leads to ask whether

Question 0.2: Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor anti-isomorphic to itself is of that form. V. Jones answered negatively ina group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Jones, this paperhere (1980, 1980) by building: No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is anti-isomorphic to itself but without involutory antiautomorphisms (whereas $LG$$L\Gamma$ has so). Then:

The answers for the next two questions were pointed out by Jiang's comments.

Question 0.3 (Remark 5.7 in previous paper): Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (after Jiang's comment): No, A. Ioana built inIoana this paperhere (2010, 2010): No, because there are $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors $M$ whose amplifications $M^t$ (with $t \neq 1$) admit an involutory antiautomorphism but are not group von Neumann algebras, see (see Corollary F, Corollary 10.1 and Remark 10.3). Then:

Updated questionQuestion 0.4: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomormphic to a group von Neumann algebra (i.e. of the form $(LG)^t$$(L\Gamma)^t$)?
Answer (Boutonnet here, 2013): No, because there are crossed product von Neumann algebra $L^{\infty}(X,\mu) \rtimes_{\sigma} \Gamma$, with $σ$ a pmp-action of an ICC group $Γ$ on a probability space $(X,μ)$, which are not stably isomorphic to a group von Neumann algebra.

In other wordsQuestion: DoesIs a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism admit an amplification which isstably isomorphic to a group von Neumann algebra $L \Gamma$ or a crossed product $L^{\infty}(X,\mu) \rtimes_{\sigma} \Gamma$ (as above)? 
If[if not, it there stillmore generally, stably isomorphic to $A⋊Γ$ with $A$ an abstract characterizationabelian von Neumann algebra?]

Remark: The existence of sucha Kac algebra generating a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors?factor not stably isomorphic to any $A⋊Γ$ (as above) would be very interesting.

The initial question and then Connes' paper were pointed out to me by Keshab Chandra Bakshi.

The group von Neumann algebra $LG$ is a factor if and only if the group $G$ is ICC (i.e. infinite conjugacy class property). Moreover if $G$ is nontrivial then $LG$ is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor.

The initial question is to ask whether every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor is of this form (Problem 4.4.10 in this book of S. Sakai, 1971). A. Connes answered negatively in this paper (1975) by building a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is not anti-isomorphic to itself (whereas $LG$ is so). This leads to ask whether every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor anti-isomorphic to itself is of that form. V. Jones answered negatively in this paper (1980) by building a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is anti-isomorphic to itself but without involutory antiautomorphisms (whereas $LG$ has so). Then:

Question: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (after Jiang's comment): No, A. Ioana built in this paper (2010) $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors $M$ whose amplifications $M^t$ (with $t \neq 1$) admit an involutory antiautomorphism but are not group von Neumann algebras, see Corollary F, Corollary 10.1 and Remark 10.3. Then:

Updated question: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism of the form $(LG)^t$?

In other words: Does a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism admit an amplification which is a group von Neumann algebra? If not, it there still an abstract characterization of such $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors?

The initial question and then Connes' paper were pointed out to me by Keshab Chandra Bakshi.

The group von Neumann algebra $L\Gamma$ is a factor if and only if the group $\Gamma$ is ICC (i.e. infinite conjugacy class property). Moreover if $\Gamma$ is nontrivial then $L\Gamma$ is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor.

Question 0.1 (Sakai, Problem 4.4.10 here, 1971): Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Connes here, 1975): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is not anti-isomorphic to itself (whereas $L\Gamma$ is so).

Question 0.2: Is every $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor anti-isomorphic to itself a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Jones, here, 1980): No, because there is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor which is anti-isomorphic to itself but without involutory antiautomorphisms (whereas $L\Gamma$ has so).

The answers for the next two questions were pointed out by Jiang's comments.

Question 0.3 (Remark 5.7 in previous paper): Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism a group von Neumann algebra?
Answer (Ioana here, 2010): No, because there are $\mathrm{II}_1$ factors $M$ whose amplifications $M^t$ (with $t \neq 1$) admit an involutory antiautomorphism but are not group von Neumann algebras (see Corollary F, Corollary 10.1 and Remark 10.3).

Question 0.4: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomormphic to a group von Neumann algebra (i.e. of the form $(L\Gamma)^t$)?
Answer (Boutonnet here, 2013): No, because there are crossed product von Neumann algebra $L^{\infty}(X,\mu) \rtimes_{\sigma} \Gamma$, with $σ$ a pmp-action of an ICC group $Γ$ on a probability space $(X,μ)$, which are not stably isomorphic to a group von Neumann algebra.

Question: Is a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor with an involutory antiautomorphism stably isomorphic to a group von Neumann algebra $L \Gamma$ or a crossed product $L^{\infty}(X,\mu) \rtimes_{\sigma} \Gamma$ (as above)? 
[if not, more generally, stably isomorphic to $A⋊Γ$ with $A$ an abelian von Neumann algebra?]

Remark: The existence of a Kac algebra generating a $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor not stably isomorphic to any $A⋊Γ$ (as above) would be very interesting.

The initial question and then Connes' paper were pointed out to me by Keshab Chandra Bakshi.

clarification that the question was updated after Jiang's comment
Source Link
Sebastien Palcoux
  • 27k
  • 5
  • 74
  • 186
Loading
updated question after Jiang comment
Source Link
Sebastien Palcoux
  • 27k
  • 5
  • 74
  • 186
Loading
Source Link
Sebastien Palcoux
  • 27k
  • 5
  • 74
  • 186
Loading