Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
15 votes
5 answers
3k views

How is it possible for PA+¬Con(PA) to be consistent?

I'm having some trouble understanding how a certain first-order theory isn't just straight-up inconsistent. Let $PA$ be the axioms of (first-order) Peano arithmetic and let $C$ be the following ...
E8 Heterotic's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
630 views

Is $\mathsf{R}$ axiomatizable by finitely many schemes?

Recall that $\mathsf{R}$ is the theory of arithmetic consisting of the quantifier-free theory of $(\mathbb{N};+,\times,0,1,<)$ together with, for each $k\in\mathbb{N}$, the sentence $$\forall x[(\...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
560 views

Models of PRA/EFA with induction on $X$ but not $\omega^X$

As I currently understand it, induction on formulas containing $N+1$ first-order quantifiers is required to prove the well-ordering of the ordinal $(\omega \uparrow\uparrow N) < \epsilon_0$, that ...
Eliezer Yudkowsky's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
110 views

How tightly are decidability and "induction-completeness" linked?

It is known that there are a number of expansions of the structure $\mathfrak{N}:=(\mathbb{N};+)$ which are decidable (= have computable theories); one such example is the expansion by a predicate ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
436 views

Interpreting proper elementarily equivalent end extensions?

Is there a tuple of parameter-free formulas $\Phi$ and a nonstandard $M\models PA$ such that $\Phi^M\models PA$, the induced $M$-definable initial segment embedding $j_\Phi^M:M\rightarrow\Phi^M$ is ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
162 views

Can this theory of dyadic rationals prove that multiplying by three is the same as summing thrice?

(This question arose from a discussion with Jade Vanadium about a theory of dyadic rationals.) Let $T$ be the 2-sorted FOL theory with sorts $ℕ,ℚ$ and constant-symbols $0,1$ and binary function-...
user21820's user avatar
  • 2,912