Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
6 votes
1 answer
395 views

Relationship between canonical topology on a topos and its site of definition

The canonical (Grothendieck) topology for a category $C$ is the largest (finest) topology such that every representable presheaf over $C$ is a sheaf. According to First Order Categorical Logic Lemma 1....
Joey Eremondi's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
151 views

Is the slice of a subcanonical site also subcanonical?

A subcanonical site is one for which every representable functor is a sheaf. For a subcanonical site $C$, the fundamental theorem of topos theory says that there is an equivalence $Sh(C/c)\cong Sh(C)/...
Joey Eremondi's user avatar
19 votes
2 answers
393 views

Why is $1$ not a dense sub-site in a group with the trivial Grothendieck topology?

A friend of mine had the following question while reading the section "C2.2 The topos of sheaves" in "Sketches of an Elephant". Let $G$ be a group (considered as a category with ...
Arshak Aivazian's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
530 views

Flasque sheaves on a site

This is a cross-post from MathStackexchange. We define a flasque sheaf on a site as one whose first Čech cohomology vanishes for every covering of every object of the site. I know this definition is ...
Jehu314's user avatar
  • 153
13 votes
0 answers
481 views

Making the conceptual leap from locales to Grothendieck topologies?

I find the definition for locales and sheaves on locales to be straightforward, but I'm stumbling over the idea of a Grothendieck topology. Is there a nice way to see roughly how the latter ...
Harrison Smith's user avatar