Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
27 votes
0 answers
469 views

Are these comparison morphisms between Čech and Grothendieck cohomology the same?

For better or for worse, there is more than one approach to comparing Čech cohomology $\smash{\check{H}}^\bullet(\mathfrak{U},X;\mathscr{F})$ of a sheaf $\mathscr{F}$ on a space $X$ w.r.t the cover $\...
FShrike's user avatar
  • 1,021
9 votes
0 answers
475 views

Using higher topos theory to study Cech cohomology

It seems to me that many classical statements about Cech cohomology should without much effort follow from Lurie's HTT, but I am struggling to fill out the details. I want to show that, given an ...
Markus Zetto's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
760 views

The Yoneda pairing, hypercohomology, and cup product

Let $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ be coherent analytic sheaves on $\mathbb{P}^n$. Let $\mathcal{F}_\bullet$ be a locally free resolution of $\mathcal{F}$. In Principles of Algebraic Geometry by ...
Svinto's user avatar
  • 294
1 vote
1 answer
521 views

Connecting homomorphism in Cech cohomology

Let $M$ be a smooth manifold and $\mathcal{U}$ be a good open cover of $M$. If I have an exact sequence of sheaves $$0 \longrightarrow A \stackrel{f}\longrightarrow B \stackrel{g}\longrightarrow C \...
Joao Vitor's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
236 views

Canonicity of Čech cohomology

For a topological space $X$, consider the Leray covering $U_\lambda$ (i.e. $\cap U_\lambda$ is sufficiently fine, e.g. affine for Zariski topology) of $X$. For a sheaf $F$ on $X,$ the cohomology $H^...
Pierre MATSUMI's user avatar