All Questions
8 questions
11
votes
4
answers
2k
views
The category of finite locally-free commutative group schemes
I'm trying to understand the properties of the category $\mathcal{FL}/S$ of finite locally-free commutative group schemes over an arbitrary base-scheme $S$. I know it is not in general an abelian ...
8
votes
1
answer
3k
views
Orbits of group scheme action
I am interested in orbits of the action of a group scheme on a scheme and I'm particularly interested in the following special case: Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field, let $G$ be an affine ...
6
votes
0
answers
239
views
Can we classify reductive group schemes over curves
Let $C$ be a smooth quasi-projective connected curve over the complex numbers.
Can one classify all reductive group schemes over $C$?
Certainly, you have the trivial ones (coming from pulling-back ...
4
votes
0
answers
326
views
Tannaka categories and reductive groups
The group associated to a Tannaka category $T$ over a field is pro-reductive if and only if $T$ is semi-simple.
Pro-reductive groups make sense over any scheme.
Is there an extension of the theory ...
3
votes
1
answer
260
views
Chevalley devissage
Let $G$ be an algebraic group over a perfect field $k$. Then it is know that it can be written as an extension of an affine algebraic group and a proper algebraic group.
Is there a similar result for ...
2
votes
0
answers
154
views
A schematic representability of an algebraic space with group action
In the book "Néron Models" (BLR), there is a statement as follows (on page 164):
Let $S$ be a locally noetherian scheme and let $G$ be a smooth algebraic group space over $S$ with connected ...
1
vote
0
answers
165
views
Discriminant ideal in a member of Barsotti-Tate Group
Let $S = \operatorname{Spec} R$ an affine scheme (in our case latter a complete dvr) and $p$ a prime. Then Barsotti-Tate group or $p$-divisible group $G$ of height $h$ over $S$
is an inductive system
...
0
votes
0
answers
118
views
Induced action on infinitesimal thickenings by an algebraic group
Let $X$ be an irreducible locally noetherian $k$-scheme (for $k$ any field), $G$ an algebraic group acting on $X$ via $a:G \times X \to X$ and $x \in X$ a closed point, which is by Zariski's lemma ...