All Questions

Recently in a seminar the following question was raised and, despite my familiarity with theory, I couldn't come up with a good answer: Are there any good reasons to use Tate's theory of rigid-...

Let $k$ be a complete non-archimedean field. In definitions I have seen of bornological vector spaces over $k$ there are usually some extra assumptions on the non-archimedean field. For instance in '...

A Tate affinoid k-algebra is defined as a pair $(R,R^+)$ where $R$ is a Tate algebra and $R^+$ is an open and integrally closed subring of $R$ contained in the ring of powerbounded elements. See for ...

Let $\mathbb K$ be an algebraically-closed complete non-archimedean field whose absolute value is non-trivial. Consider the Tate algebra $T_n=\mathbb K\langle X_1,\dots, X_n \rangle$ and fix $f\in T_n$...