All Questions
5 questions
9
votes
1
answer
369
views
Geometric quantization: why are the prequantum operators self-adjoint?
I'm reading a bit about geometric quantization and, among the axioms of this construction, is one requiring that the operator $\hat f = -\textrm i \hbar \nabla _{X_f} + f$ associated to the classical ...
1
vote
0
answers
662
views
On prequantization bundles over integral symplectic manifolds
I am trying to clarify certain subtleties regarding prequantization bundles over symplectic manifolds, for which I haven't found any clear explanation so far.
Let me fix some definitions first.
...
1
vote
0
answers
176
views
On different definitions of a prequantization space
Geometric quantization associates to a symplectic manifold $(M,\omega)$ a hermitian line bundle $L \to M$ with connection $\nabla$ whose curvature is $\omega$ (up to some constant).
Without talking ...
9
votes
1
answer
704
views
Physical intuition behind prequantization spaces
Given a symplectic manifold $(M,\omega)$ with integral symplectic form, that is $$\omega \in \text{Im}(H_2(M,\mathbb{Z}) \to H_2(M,\mathbb{R})),$$ one can form a so-called prequantization space, that ...
8
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Why is geometric quantization (esp. Berezin-Toeplitz quantization) interesting for a symplectic geometer/topologist?
I know that many symplectic geometers are interested in quantization as well.
From what I understood, quantization isn't expected to be used as a tool to answer symplectic questions (as in ...