Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
4 votes
1 answer
208 views

What should be required from a model category so that the category of algebraic objects in it has the natural model structure?

I have two reference questions What should be required of a category with finite products so that a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory induces a monadic adjunction on it? This should be ...
Arshak Aivazian's user avatar
26 votes
1 answer
2k views

Infinity-categorical analogue of compact Hausdorff

Recently I became through this mathoverflow question aware of the article Codensity and the ultrafilter monad by Tom Leinster. There he shows that the ultrafilter monad on the category $\mathrm{Set}$ ...
Lennart Meier's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
391 views

Different ways to “deloop” a (topological) $A_\infty$-algebra

Let $\varphi:A\to \mathrm{Ass}$ be an $A_\infty$-operad in topological spaces, and let $X$ be an $A$-algebra. I see three possibilities to construct a delooping out of $X$: Rectify $X$ by taking the ...
FKranhold's user avatar
  • 1,623
11 votes
2 answers
755 views

When does the forgetful functor from algebras over a monad commute with homotopy geometric realizations?

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a combinatorial model category and $\mathrm{T}$ a monad on $\mathcal{C}.$ Assume that the model structure on $\mathcal{C}$ lifts to a model structure on the category of $\...
Hadrian Heine's user avatar
9 votes
2 answers
366 views

monadic decomposition

Let $\mathrm{F}: \mathcal{C} \rightleftarrows \mathcal{D} : \mathrm{G} $ be an adjunction with associated monad $\mathrm{T} = \mathrm{G} \mathrm{F} .$ If $\mathcal{D} $ admits coequalizers of $\...
Hadrian Heine's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
166 views

Algebras of the cone monad on Top?

Let us work in Top, the category of topological spaces - although the reader is welcome to replace this by their favorite convenient category of topological spaces. If $X,Y$ are spaces, let $X\ast Y$ ...
Patrick Nicodemus's user avatar
9 votes
2 answers
739 views

Correspondence between operads and monads requires tensor distribute over coproduct?

In checking the details of the correspondence between operads over a symmetric monoidal category and monads on some associated endofunctor of the category, I cannot make the obvious proof work without ...
ziggurism's user avatar
  • 1,446
6 votes
2 answers
848 views

Monadicity theorem in homotopy theory.

Let $\mathbf{C}$ be a cofibrantly generated model category (assume for simplicity that all objects are fibrant) and $\mathbf{C}^{\mathrm{T}}$ the category of $\mathrm{T}$-algebras with the induced ...
Ilias A.'s user avatar
  • 1,974
7 votes
2 answers
858 views

What are the algebras over $\Omega^k\Sigma^k$ ?

Let $Ho(Spc)$ be the homotopy category of spaces. There is an adjoint pair $$ \Sigma^k \colon Ho(Spc) \leftrightarrows Ho(Spc)\colon \Omega^k, $$ where $\Sigma^k$ is the $k$-th supension functor and $\...
Toribio Smith's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
763 views

When do reflexive coequalizers preserve weak equivalences?

In my work I've run into the following situation. In a model category, I have two reflexive coequalizers $A_i \stackrel{\to}{\to} B_i \to C_i$ and a map of diagrams which is levelwise a weak ...
David White's user avatar
  • 30.3k
1 vote
1 answer
288 views

comparison between two monadic definitions for an operad

According to May, an operad $\mathcal{C}$ valued in sets is equivalent to a monad in Cat on the endofunctor $C\colon X\mapsto \coprod_i \mathcal{C}(i)\times X^i.$ According to Leinster, an operad is ...
ziggurism's user avatar
  • 1,446
21 votes
0 answers
1k views

Can we describe equivariant vector bundles of free group action in terms of descent theory (Barr-Beck theorem)?

It is well known that for a compact topological group $G$ acts (say, from the right) freely on a compact space $X$. Then the category of equivariant complex vector bundles on $X$, $\text{Vect}_G(X)$, ...
Zhaoting Wei's user avatar
  • 9,019