Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
44 votes
2 answers
2k views

Fermat's Last Theorem for integer matrices

Some years ago I was asked by a friend if Fermat's Last Theorem was true for matrices. It is pretty easy to convince oneself that it is not the case, and in fact the following statement occurs ...
Luis Ferroni's user avatar
  • 1,889
10 votes
1 answer
537 views

Coefficient-wise powers of matrices. Reference wanted

Let $K$ be a commutative field and ${\rm M}_n (K)$ be the ring of $n\times n$ square matrices with coefficients in $K$ ($n\geqslant 1$ is an integer). For $k\geqslant 1$ and $A =(a_{ij})_{1\leqslant i,...
Paul Broussous's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
472 views

$M = AA^t$ where $A$ has unit norm columns

Let $M \in \mathbb{R}^{k\times k}$ positive definite with $\operatorname{tr} M = m$, where $m$ is an integer such that $m \geq k$. I have found a way (using this answer) to decompose $M = AA^t$ with $...
Yair Daon's user avatar
  • 185
6 votes
3 answers
3k views

Defining Multiplication in Polynomials over Rings of Matrices

More explicitly, if $M_{2 \times 2}(\mathbb{R})[x]$ denotes the ring of polynomials over the ring of 2x2 matrices with real coefficients (with indeterminate x a 2 by 2 matrix with real coefficients), ...
Brian Hepler's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
239 views

Attempts to define a matrix exponential over (as much as possible) general fields

Given a $n \times n$ matrix $A$ over the complex numbers, the exponential of $A$ is defined as $$\exp(A) := \sum_{k = 1}^\infty \frac1{k!} A^k , \qquad \tag{$\star$}\label{468645_star}$$ where ...
rosan98's user avatar
  • 361
4 votes
1 answer
233 views

Generating of the matrix ring by two hermitian matices

Let $p$ be a prime and $q=p^n$. Let $\mathbb F_{q^2}$ be a field with $q^2$ elements and $\sigma$ its authomorhism of order two. A $m$ by $m$ matrix $A$ over $\mathbb F_{q^2}$ is hermitian if $A^\...
3 votes
0 answers
39 views

A non-singularity property for sets of real matrices

Let $M_N(\mathbb{R})$ be the ring of $N\times N$ real matrices. We say that a couple $(\mathcal{U},\mathcal{V})$, with $\mathcal{U},\mathcal{V}\subseteq M_N(\mathbb{R})$ is admissible if, for every $A\...
Capublanca's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
231 views

Singularity of symmetric block matrix with singular diagonal blocks

One can show that the following statement holds: Given symmetric matrix $A \in \Re^{n \times n}$ and tall matrix $B \in \Re^{n \times p}$ with full column rank, $$\begin{bmatrix}A & B \\ B^T &...
Minji Kim's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
180 views

Automorphisms of infinite matrix algebra

This is a similar question to one that I posted in MSE a few days ago. I recently came across this paper from Alahmedi, Alsulami, Jain and Zelmanov, which quoted the following result for $M_\infty(K)$...
dbossaller's user avatar