All Questions

I would like to understand an argument in https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF01393904.pdf, which uses Langlands' result on the constant term of Eisenstein series, but I'm not getting it ...

Let $\psi$ be an odd Dirichlet character of $G_{\mathbb{Q}}$ with conductor equal to $N$ and $p \nmid N$ be a prime number. Assume that $\psi(Frob_p)=1$. Denote by $E_{\psi,1} \in S_1(\Gamma_1(N))$ ...