Skip to main content

All Questions

2 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
0 answers
280 views

Why do we consider characters to $\mathbb{C}$ and not $\mathfrak{p}$-adic or $\mathbb{R}$?

Context: I've been reading Tate's thesis, and in it, we defined the character group for $k^{*}$ and $k^{+}$ for a local field $k$. Here we take the range of the characters to be $S_{1}$ for $k^{+}$ ...
Rits's user avatar
  • 133
2 votes
0 answers
168 views

Does Langlands use the geometric Frobenius or the classical Frobenius in his papers?

In several of Langlands' papers: Representations of Abelian Algebraic Groups, On Artin's L-functions, On the Functional Equation of Artin's L-functions, Langlands takes a finite Galois extension $K/F$ ...
D_S's user avatar
  • 6,180