All Questions

Why is it (and what does it mean) that automorphic forms do not contribute in the coherent cohomology of Siegel modular varieties parametrizing abelian varieties of dimension $d>2$ (see section 7 ...

Suppose $V$ is an algebraic variety over a number field $K$. The absolute Galois group $G_K$ of $K$ acts by outer automorphisms on the étale fundamental group $\pi_1(V_{\bar{K}})$ where $\bar{K}$ is ...

For a reductive group $G$ over a number field $K$, an automorphic representation for $(G, K)$ is an irreducible admissible constituent of the right regular representation of $G(\mathbb{A}_K)$ in the ...

Consider $\mathcal{M} = \{M_{g,n}, \mu_{g,n}^{g’,n’}\}$, the system of moduli spaces of $n$-pointed smooth algebraic curves along with the basic maps amongst them coming from identifying and ...

By the Modularity Theorem (a.k.a. the Shimura--Taniyama--Weil Conjecture), if $E$ is an elliptic curve over $\textbf{Q}$ with conductor $N$, then there exists a “modular parametrization” $\psi: X_0(N) ...

Let $E$ be an elliptic curve defined over $\mathbf{Q}$. Let $p \geq 5$ be a prime of additive reduction for $E$. Let $f$ be the newform associated to $E$, and let $\pi$ be the irreducible admissible ...