All Questions
4 questions
1
vote
0
answers
117
views
Quotient of K3 surface: complex vs positive characteristic
Let $f: X \to X$ be a non-symplectic automorphism of finite order of complex projective K3 surface $X$. (Recall: Non-symplectic means that the induced action on $H(X,K_X)=H^0(X, \Omega_X^2)$ is not ...
1
vote
0
answers
219
views
Quotient of K3 surfaces by non-symplectic automorphism of finite order
Let $X$ be a $K3$ surface and $f: X \to X$ a non-symplectic morphism (ie non symplectic in sense of that that the induced action on $H(X,K_X=H^0(X, \Omega_X^2)$ is not trivial) of finite order.
...
0
votes
0
answers
112
views
Irregularity of surfaces for dominant maps
I have a question about an argument in the proof of Lemma 1.2.(1) in Quotients of K3 surfaces modulo involutions by D. Q. Zhang:
Let Let $(X, \sigma)$ be X be a smooth projective K3 surface with an ...
0
votes
0
answers
99
views
Quotients of K3 surfaces vs cyclic covers
Let $X$ be an algebraic K3 surface (for sake of simplicity, with base field of char $\neq 2$) and $f: X \to X$ a non-symplectic morphism (i.e. non-symplectic in sense of that that the induced action ...