MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I encounter a problem when reading Struwe's book Variational Methods (4th ed). On page 38, it is assumed that

$\|u_m\|$ is a minimizing sequence for a functional $E$, i.e. $E(u_m)\rightharpoonup I$ in $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)$,

and then it assume in addition that

$u_m\rightharpoonup u$ weakly in $H^{1,2}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ and pointwise almost everywhere.

My question is

why the pointwise convergence assumption is reasonable? Since $\mathbb R^n$ is not compact, the embedding theorem is not obviously valid.

Thanks in advance.

share|cite|improve this question
Asked simultaneously at… – András Bátkai Jun 1 '12 at 19:32
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Just this: for all $r > 0$ the restriction of $u_m$ to the ball $B_r$ is compact in $L^1({B_r})$, hence it has a subsequence converging a.e. there. By a standard diagonal argument, there is a single subsequence of $u_m$ converging a.e. in $\mathbb{R}^n$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Great! Thank you very much, Pietro. – Changjing Zhuge Jun 1 '12 at 17:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.