4
$\begingroup$

If $0< a_1\le a_2\le \cdots \le a_n\le a_{n+1}$ and $p>1$, is it true that $$\left(\frac{n+1}{n}\right)^{1-\frac{1}{p}}\left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n+1}a_i^p}{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i^p}\right)^{\frac{1}{p}}\ge \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n+1}a_i}{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i}?$$ The numerator and denominator looks like Hölder's inequality.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Can you tell us why you suspect this? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 10, 2012 at 21:55
  • $\begingroup$ If it is true, then I have something to say, but.... $\endgroup$
    – Russel
    Commented Mar 10, 2012 at 22:36

1 Answer 1

10
$\begingroup$

It's not true. Your proposed inequality can be thought of as saying that the quotient

$(L^p\text{-average of }a_1,\ldots,a_n)/(L^1\text{-average of }a_1,\ldots,a_n)$

is nondecreasing in $n$. If this were true for large $p$ then it would be true for $p=\infty$, which would say that

$a_n/(L^1\text{-average of }a_1,\ldots,a_n)$

is nondecreasing in $n$. But this is clearly false. Just take $a_{n+1}=a_n$: the numerator stays the same but the denominator increases.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Clever argument. $\endgroup$
    – Russel
    Commented Mar 10, 2012 at 22:36
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For example, $a_1 = 1$, $a_2 = a_3 = p = 100$ works. $\endgroup$
    – Woett
    Commented Mar 11, 2012 at 14:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .