3
$\begingroup$

Let $f_k$ be a sequence of non-negative functions from $L_2(\Omega)$, where $\Omega$ is a bounded open set. Assume that $f_k\to f$ weakly in $L_2$ and strongly in $L_p$, $\forall p<2$. Assume also that $f_k^2\to F$ weakly in $L_1$. Does it imply that $F=f^2$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ No, thanks, but non-negativity seems to be important. $\endgroup$ – user21629 Feb 23 '12 at 12:25
4
$\begingroup$

The answer is "yes", even for non non-negative $f_n$. First assume $f=0$. Since $f_n\to 0$ in $L_1$, WLOG by passing to a subsequence $f_n\to 0$ a.e. and hence $f_n^2\to 0$ a.e. But $f_n^2$ converges weakly in $L_1$ hence is uniformly integrable, whence $\|f_n^2\|_1 \to 0$.

The general case follows from the special case once you verify that $(f-f_n)^2$ is weakly convergent in $L_1$. Since $f_n^2$ converges weakly in $L_1$, it is enough to show that $f_n f$ converges weakly in $L_1$ to $f^2$, which in turn follows from the facts that $f_n$ converges weakly in $L_2$ to $f$ and $fg$ is in $L_2$ for every $g$ in $L_\infty$

Unfamiliar background can be found in standard text books; in particular, the book of Albiac and Kalton.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The unnecessary assumption that $f_n \ge 0$ makes the problem harder. $\endgroup$ – Bill Johnson Feb 23 '12 at 18:29
  • $\begingroup$ I fixed the final equation in the first paragraph (from $f_n$ to $f_n^2$). $\endgroup$ – Matthew Daws Feb 23 '12 at 20:05
  • $\begingroup$ In the first sentence, do you really mean "even for non negative?" $\endgroup$ – Yemon Choi Feb 23 '12 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry for the unnecessary assumptions $\endgroup$ – user21629 Feb 24 '12 at 19:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.