1
$\begingroup$

The potential flow theory in 2D is described from the incompressibility condition $${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\nabla \cdot \mathbf u =0},&&{\mathbf u=\nabla \varphi}\,.\end{aligned}}}$$

$$\nabla^2\varphi=0$$

with the Cauchy-Riemann equations

$${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}u&={\frac {\partial \varphi }{\partial x}}={\frac {\partial \psi }{\partial y}},&v&={\frac {\partial \varphi }{\partial y}}=-{\frac {\partial \psi }{\partial x}}\,.\end{aligned}}}$$

From there we can obtain practically all we need to model the flow.

We draw the velocity field using the vector potential $\psi$, since the vector potential is colinear with the velocity field.

Lamb and Batchelor define the stream function $\psi$ as follows: ${\displaystyle \psi (x,y,t)=\int _{A}^{P}\left(u\,\mathrm {d} y-v\,\mathrm {d} x\right)}$ . Where the velocity field is defined with :

$${\displaystyle \quad \mathbf {u} ={\begin{bmatrix}u(x,y,t)\\v(x,y,t)\\0\end{bmatrix}}.}$$

I heard that the stream-function $\psi$ is not defined for dimensions higher than 2.

Why is that?

How do we draw the velocity field in dimensions higher than 2 if $\psi$ is not defined and we need it to draw the velocity field, since it is colinear with the velocity vector?

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Your question is a little vague. What setup do you want in dimension 3, and what kind of analysis are you interested in making? The main issue is that in dimension 2 ODEs are fairly tame due to structural theorems like Poincare-Bendixson. In dimension 3 there are no such theorems, and ODEs have far more wild characteristics. But if your setup is tame-enough there are certainly things you can say. But I don't know what kinds of problems you are interested in. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 7 at 21:23
  • $\begingroup$ @RyanBudney Hi, I actually changed my question a little now. I am actually interested now in why the streamfunction $\psi$ can not be defined in 3D? Furthermore, how can we solve potential flow problems without it than, if we use it to draw the velocity field. $\endgroup$
    – User198
    Commented Oct 10 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ What definition are you using for the "stream function"? Is it just the solution to your PDE? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 10 at 18:13
  • $\begingroup$ Lamb and Batchelor define the stream function $\psi$ as follows: ${\displaystyle \psi (x,y,t)=\int _{A}^{P}\left(u\,\mathrm {d} y-v\,\mathrm {d} x\right)}$ . It is a vector potential. It is defined for $R^2$, but what do we do when we want to model $R^3$ flow and we don't want to solve the full NS equations, but model with potential flow. $\endgroup$
    – User198
    Commented Oct 10 at 18:15
  • $\begingroup$ What does that mean? Your right hand side has a u and v, but the left-hand side does not. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 10 at 18:16

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .