4
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a group (finite, say) with center $Z$. The automorphism group $\text{Aut}(G)$ sits in a short exact sequence $$ 1 \to G/Z \to \text{Aut}(G) \to \text{Out}(G) \to 1. $$ So when $Z\neq 1$, as is often the case, $G$ does not itself naturally embed in its automorphism group.

Questions: I would like to know if there is any way to remedy this defect and extend $\text{Aut}(G)$ to contain $G$. [I'm mainly interested in the case where $G$ is an extraspecial $2$-group, but I think the general question is kind of fun.] Specifically:

  1. Is there any extension $$ 1 \to G \to \widetilde{\text{Aut}}(G) \to \text{Out(G)} \to 1,$$ together with a homomorphism $\widetilde{\text{Aut}}(G)\to\text{Aut}(G)$ extending $G\to G/Z$ and commuting with the maps to $\text{Out}(G)$? (Thanks YCor for suggesting this clarification!)

  2. If so, is there a natural construction of such an extension?

I suspect the answer to Question 1 is "no": it feels too good to be true. Even so, it would still be nice to know:

  1. What if we replace $\text{Aut}(G)$ by the group $\text{Aut}^\circ(G)$ of automorphisms trivial on $Z$?

  2. What is the obstruction to $\widetilde{\text{Aut}}(G)$ existing?

The group $\widetilde{\text{Aut}}(G)$ would be an extension of $\text{Aut}(G)$ by $Z$, so there is some hope of describing it using group cohomology. From this perspective, the question becomes, in a weak form:

  1. Must the image of the pullback map $H^2(\text{Aut}(G),Z) \to H^2(G/Z,Z)$ contain a class corresponding to $G$?

Examples: These are surely too simple, but give some small positive evidence:

  • If $G=Z$ is abelian then we can take $\widetilde{\text{Aut}}(Z) = Z \rtimes \text{Aut}(Z)$.

  • More generally, if the map $\text{Aut}(G) \to \text{Out}(G)$ splits (that is, admits a homomorphic section) then we can take $\widetilde{\text{Aut}}(G) = G \rtimes \text{Out}(G)$. Here $\widetilde{\text{Aut}}(G)$ would seem to depend on the choice of splitting.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ An extension as in (1) would give an action of $\text{Out}(G)$ on $G$ by conjugation. In the case $G=\Sigma_6$ this would give a choice of outer automorphism of $\Sigma_6$, which cannot be natural. Here the centre is trivial so $\text{Aut}(G)=\text{Aut}^{\circ}(G)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 24 at 12:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ (1) is too weak, since the direct product does the job. One should at least ask the existence of a homomorphism $\widetilde{\mathrm{Aut}}\to\mathrm{Aut}$ such that the obvious squares (between the two short exact sequences) commute, and or the induced endomorphism of $\mathrm{Out}(G)$ be the identity. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Aug 24 at 12:37
  • $\begingroup$ It's like saying $1+1\neq3$ is a defect. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 24 at 13:55
  • $\begingroup$ @NeilStrickland How would this extension give an action of Out(G) on G? I don't see why that follows from general principles. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 24 at 15:38
  • $\begingroup$ $G = {\rm SL}(2,9)$ is a counterexample with ${\rm Aut}(G) \cong{\rm P \Gamma L}(2,9)$. $\endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Commented Aug 24 at 15:45

1 Answer 1

14
$\begingroup$

Jesper Grodal and I once looked at this, cf. this answer. In particular Eilenberg and MacLane constructs a universal obstruction in $H^3(\text{Out}(G);Z(G))$ for the extension $1\rightarrow G\rightarrow \widetilde{\text{Aut}}(G) \rightarrow \text{Out}(G) \rightarrow 1$ to exists. A good reference is Brown's "Cohomology of groups". For small groups one can compute this obstruction explicitly, it turns out to be non-zero for the group $D_{16}$. As this has center $C_2$ question number 3 unfortunately also has a negative solution.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .