7
$\begingroup$

Let $E/\mathbb{Q}$ be an elliptic curve, and let $k_1, k_2$ be square-free integers. Can anything be said about the related elliptic curves

$$\displaystyle E/\mathbb{Q}, E^{(k_1)}/\mathbb{Q}, E^{(k_2)}/\mathbb{Q}, E^{(k_1 k_2)}/\mathbb{Q}?$$

Here $E^{(d)}$ is the quadratic twist of $E$ by $d$. If $E$ has the short Weierstrass equation

$$\displaystyle E: y^2 = x^3 + Ax + B, A, B \in \mathbb{Z}$$

then $E^{(d)}$ has the short Weierstrass equation

$$\displaystyle E^{(d)}: dy^2 = x^3 + Ax + B.$$

In particular, let $r(E)$ denote the algebraic rank of $E$ and $r_{\text{an}}(E)$ denote the analytic rank. Are there any relations between the integers

$$\displaystyle r(E), r(E^{(k_1)}), r(E^{(k_2)}), r(E^{(k_1 k_2)})$$

or

$$\displaystyle r_{\text{an}}(E), r_{\text{an}}(E^{(k_1)}), r_{\text{an}}(E^{(k_2)}), r_{\text{an}}(E^{(k_1 k_2)})?$$

Edit:

Observe that if we write

$\displaystyle L(E,s) = \prod_p \left(1 - \frac{\alpha_p}{p^s} \right) \left(1 - \frac{\beta_p}{p^s} \right)$

for the Hasse-Weil $L$-function of $E$, then we have

$\displaystyle L(E,s) L(E^{(k_1 k_2)},s) = \prod_p \left(1 - \frac{\alpha_p}{p^s} \right) \left(1 - \frac{\chi_{k_1 k_2}(p) \alpha_p}{p^s} \right) \left(1 - \frac{\beta_p}{p^s} \right) \left(1 - \frac{\chi_{k_1 k_2}(p) \beta_p}{p^s} \right)$

and

$\displaystyle L(E^{(k_1)}, s) L(E^{(k_2)}, s) = \prod_p \left(1 - \frac{\chi_{k_1}(p) \alpha_p}{p^s} \right)\left(1 - \frac{\chi_{k_2}(p) \alpha_p}{p^s} \right)\left(1 - \frac{\chi_{k_1}(p) \beta_p}{p^s} \right)\left(1 - \frac{\chi_{k_2}(p) \beta_p}{p^s} \right).$

In particular, their Euler factor at $p$ coincides whenever $\chi_{k_1 k_2}(p) = -1$, and whenever $\chi_{k_1 k_2}(p) = \chi_{k_1}(p) = \chi_{k_2}(p) = 1$. Therefore, the Euler factors match for $3/4$'s of primes $p$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ $k_1$ and $k_2$ could be prime numbers, say $p$ and $q$, so then you are asking for relations between $E^{(p)}$, $E^{(q)}$ and just $E$, right? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12 at 13:19
  • $\begingroup$ @AriyanJavanpeykar and also the twist $E^{(pq)}$. In particular, one might hope to say something about a relation between the pairs $\{r(E), r(E^{(pq)})\}, \{r(E^{(p)}), r(E^{(q)})\}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12 at 13:20
  • $\begingroup$ Apologies, I misread the (k_1k_2), I thought it was the gcd $(k_1,k_2)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12 at 13:21

3 Answers 3

4
$\begingroup$

You are looking at the biquadratic extension $K:=\mathbb Q(\sqrt{k_1},\sqrt{k_2})$ of $\mathbb Q$ and want to relate properties of $E(F)$ where $F$ is $\mathbb Q$ or one of the quadratic subfields $F_1,F_2,F_3$ of $K$. If you're also willing to throw $K$ into the mix, then you can use the (unique) idempotent relation on $\text{Gal}(K/\mathbb Q)$ to get a relation on the ranks of $E(K)$, $E(F_1)$, $E(F_2)$, $E(F_3)$, and $E(\mathbb Q)$. This is part of a much larger theory. See for example Kani, Ernst; Rosen, Michael, Idempotent relations among arithmetic invariants attached to number fields and algebraic varieties, J. Number Theory 46, No. 2, 230-254 (1994). ZBL0853.14011.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Let $E, E^{(k)}$ be defined over a number field $K$ and let $k \in K^\times \setminus K^2$. Then it is well-known that $$\operatorname{rk}(E/K(\sqrt d)) = \operatorname{rk}(E/K) + \operatorname{rk}(E^{(k)}/K).$$ Your question is related to the parity conjecture, which asserts that $$w(E/K) = (-1)^{\operatorname{rk}(E/K)},$$ where $w(E/K)$ is the root number of $E$ over $K$. The root number of an elliptic curve can be computed relatively easily. The following two results are taken from this survey paper and might be of interest to you.

Let $E$ be an elliptic curve over $\mathbb Q$. Then the function $k \mapsto w(E^{(k)}/\mathbb Q)$ defined on squarefree integers is periodic, with period depending on the conductor of $E$. $50\%$ of quadratic twists of $E$ have root number $1$ and $50\%$ of quadratic twists of $E$ have root number $-1$.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Here is some experimental data.

For positive integer $k$ let $E_k: y^2=x^3+k x $ and $k_1=2,k_2=3$.

According to computations with sage, for $0 < k < 2000$:

  1. At least one of $\displaystyle r_{\text{an}}(E_k), r_{\text{an}}(E_k^{(2)}), r_{\text{an}}(E_k^{(3)}), r_{\text{an}}(E_k^{(6)})$ is positive.

  2. At least one of $\displaystyle r_{\text{an}}(E_k), r_{\text{an}}(E_k^{(2)}), r_{\text{an}}(E_k^{(3)}), r_{\text{an}}(E_k^{(6)})$ is odd.

  3. For $0 < k < 10^5$ at least one of the root numbers of $\displaystyle (E_k), (E_k^{(2)}), (E_k^{(3)}), (E_k^{(6)})$ is $-1$.

Here is sage code

#Author Georgi Guninski, Mon Aug 12 04:42:25 PM UTC 2024
lim=100 #upper bound for k
for k in range(2,lim):
    Ei=[EllipticCurve([k*m^2,0]) for m in [1,2,3,6]]
    ra=[E.analytic_rank() for E in Ei]
    rap=[i%2 for i in ra]
    print(k,ra,rap)
    assert any(ra) and any(rap)
print("end")
$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Confirmed for $0 < k < 10^4$, which automatically gives the same result for all nonzero $k$ with $|k| < 10^4$ because for these curves the $d$ and $-2d$ twists are isogenous. Moreover, in each case at least one of the four ranks is even. But it's not just a parity obstruction: each of 1, 2, or 3 odd-rank twists arises about 1/3 of the time. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12 at 21:35
  • $\begingroup$ @NoamD.Elkies Many thanks for the verification. If someone else is verifying, computing only the root number is significantly faster than computing the analytic (or algebraic) rank. $\endgroup$
    – joro
    Commented Aug 13 at 6:30
  • $\begingroup$ @NoamD.Elkies I asked stronger result conjecture: mathoverflow.net/questions/476863/… $\endgroup$
    – joro
    Commented Aug 13 at 14:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.