7
$\begingroup$

I asked this question on MSE here.


Define $g(x)= |x|$ for $|x|\in [-1,1]$ , $g(x+2)=g(x)$ $$f(x)= \sum_{n \ge 1} \frac{3^n g\left(4^n x\right) }{4^n}$$

This function is a famous example of a continuous nowhere differentiable function on $\mathbb{R}$. There is a proof that the absolute value secant line's slope goes to infinity as it approaches the point so this made me wonder: will the absolute value of the $\alpha-$derivative exist if $\alpha<1$?

One can pick a very large number like $\operatorname{TREE}(3)$ and say that this function has $\alpha-$derivative $=0$ when $\alpha=1/\operatorname{TREE}(3)$ and he will probably be right so let me phrase the question in other way:
what is the $\sup \{\alpha\}$ such that $$ \lim\limits_{h \to 0 }\frac{f(x+h) -f(x)}{h^\alpha}= 0 $$ for all $x$?
Does the absolute value of the $\alpha-$derivative exist at that value of $\alpha$ ?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

10
$\begingroup$

The supremum you are looking for is $-\frac{\ln(3/4)}{\ln(4)}$. I leave my proof below, although as user479223 mentions, this is the same as showing Hölder continuity of the Weierstrass function, which is well known (see this MSE answer).

Note that for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$, $|g(x)-g(y)|\leq\min(|x-y|,1)$. Thus, for all $x,h\in\mathbb{R}$, $$ \begin{split} |f(x+h)-f(x)|&=\sum_n\frac{3^ng(4^n(x+h))}{4^n}-\frac{3^ng(4^nx)}{4^n} \\ &\leq \sum_n\frac{3^n}{4^n}\min(|4^nh|,1)\\ &=\sum_n\min\left(|3^nh|,\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^n\right). \end{split} $$ Note that when $h$ is close to $0$, the sequence $\min\left(|3^nh|,\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^n\right)$ first increases exponentially and then decreases exponentially as follows:

$$h,3h,9h,27h,\dots,3^{k_1}h,\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^{k_2},\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^{k_2+1},\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^{k_2+2},\dots$$ where both $3^{k_1}h$ and $\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^{k_2}$ are, within a factor of ten, equal to $h^{\frac{-\ln(3/4)}{\ln(4)}}$. Thus,

$$|f(x+h)-f(x)|\leq\sum_n\min\left(|3^nh|,\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^n\right)\leq100h^{\frac{-\ln(3/4)}{\ln(4)}}.$$

This means that any constant $\alpha<\frac{-\ln(3/4)}{\ln(4)}$ should make the limit of the question be $0$ for all $x$. However, if $\alpha=\frac{-\ln(3/4)}{\ln(4)}$ and my computations below are correct, then the limit $\lim\limits_{h\to0}\frac{f(h)}{h^\alpha}$ need not exist. E.g. taking $h_m=1/4^m$; then we have

$$f(h_m)=\sum_{n=1}^m\frac{3^n}{4^n}g(4^{n-m}) =\sum_{n=1}^m\frac{3^n}{4^n}4^{n-m}=\sum_{n=1}^m\frac{3^n}{4^m}.$$ Thus, $$ \lim_m\frac{f(h_m)}{h_m^\alpha}=\lim_m\frac{\left(\frac{3^m\cdot\frac{3}{2}}{4^m}\right)}{(3/4)^m}=\frac{3}{2}. $$

However, $$f(2h_m)=\sum_{n=1}^{m-1}\frac{3^n}{4^n}g(2\cdot4^{n-m})=2\sum_{n=1}^{m-1}\frac{3^n}{4^m}.$$ Thus, $$ \lim_m\frac{f(2h_m)}{(2h_m)^\alpha}=\lim_m\frac{\left(\frac{3^{m-1}\cdot\frac{3}{2}}{4^m}\right)} {2^\alpha(3/4)^m}=\frac{1}{2\cdot2^\alpha}=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}. $$

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ By the way, this is just showing that the given function is $-\log_4(3/4)$ Holder. This is the same proof of the Holder continuity of Weierstrass function e.g. $\endgroup$
    – user479223
    Commented Apr 19 at 16:51
  • $\begingroup$ You are right, it seems this is well known (see here). Well, it was a fun exercise anyways. $\endgroup$
    – Saúl RM
    Commented Apr 19 at 17:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is a very fun exercise and works for any bounded, Lipschitz function. $\endgroup$
    – user479223
    Commented Apr 19 at 18:39
  • $\begingroup$ I have other question:Is there a continuous nowhere differentiable function with α− derivative exists at sup{a}? ? $\endgroup$
    – pie
    Commented Apr 28 at 13:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @SaúlRM If you decided to write write it in detail math.stackexchange.com/questions/4906573/… $\endgroup$
    – pie
    Commented Apr 28 at 19:01
7
$\begingroup$

This is just local Holder continuity.

Let $f$ be $\gamma$ Holder at $x$. If $\alpha<\gamma$ then

$$\lim\limits_{h\to0}\frac{|f(x+h)-f(x)|}{h^\alpha}\leq\lim\limits_{h\to0} \frac{C h^\gamma}{h^\alpha}=0.$$

Conversely, suppose that

$$\lim\limits_{h\to0}\frac{|f(x+h)-f(x)|}{h^\alpha}=0.$$

By choosing $|h|<\delta$ for some $\delta>0$ and the definition of limit we have that

$$\frac{|f(x+h)-f(x)|}{h^\alpha}<1,$$

or $$|f(x+h)-f(x)|<h^\alpha.$$

See this Q&A for the relationship with fractional differentiation.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .