4
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a complex projective manifold, and $f\in Aut(X)$ an automorphism, which is linearizable, that is, can be extended to an ambient projective space ${\mathbb P}^m$. I am interested to find what is the minimal possible dimension $m$ if $X$ and $f$ are fixed. When $f$ is trivial, the minimal dimension is $2n+1$, where $n=dim(X)$, as follows from a projective version of Whitney embedding theorem. However, when $f$ is non-trivial, the best I could get so far was $2^n (2n+1)$, and for finite maps instead of embeddings. I am sure the question is classical, but I found no literature dealing with it. I would really appreciate all hints and reference, even tangentially related.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ @NickL: In this example the standard equivariant embedding goes to a projective space of dimension $2^n-1$. But it has many invariant projective subspaces, and it could be that projecting out of one of these you could obtain a smaller embedding. P.S. This is a reply to a comment that was here, but disappeared while I was typing... $\endgroup$
    – Sasha
    Commented Mar 23 at 10:46
  • $\begingroup$ @Sasha thanks, yes, I realized this and thus deleted. If anyone is interested the (wrong) example was taking f to be the automorphism of $\mathbb{P}^1 \times \ldots \times \mathbb{P}^1$ given by a cyclic permutation of the factors. $\endgroup$
    – Nick L
    Commented Mar 23 at 11:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is why I was talking about finite maps! The idea is to take a finite quotient, and then an embedding. Though the cyclic group cannot act by permutation of the factors, and I was asking about the cyclic group action, so I am not sure we cannot have an embedding. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 24 at 11:13

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The following example shows that there is a difference between equivariant finite maps and equivariant embeddings, there is no bound in terms of $n$ which garuantees an equivariant embedding. The idea of the example gives the following byproduct: If $f$ has finite order and there are $m$ subgroups appearing as the isotropy subgroup of some point(see below) then, the dimension of the projective space has to be at least $log_{2}(m) -1$.

For a space with a $\mathbb{Z}_k$-action, to every point there is a subgroup of $\mathbb{Z}_k$ we can assosiate, consisting of the elements fixing the point, called the isotropy subgroup. The argument uses a certain fact: Suppose that $\mathbb{Z}_k$ acts linearly on $\mathbb{CP}^n$, then the possiblities for the isotropy subgroup is at most $2^{n+1}$. To prove this note it is possible to lift to a linear transformation of $\mathbb{C}^{n+1}$ of order $k$, thus to diagonalize the lift. Then the isotropy subgroup of an element $p = [z_{0}: \ldots : z_{n}] \in \mathbb{CP}^n$ depends only on which of the $z_{i}$ are zero, and which are not zero. Therefore there are only $2^{n+1}$ possibilities. To make an analogy with toric geometry, the non-trivial possibilities for the strata are in bijecton with subsimplices of the $(n+1)$-simplex.

Consider the $\mathbb{C}^{*}$-action $\mathbb{CP}^{2}$ coming from the linear action on $\mathbb{C}^3$ with weights $(0,1,2)$. To any smooth invariant curve there is an isotropy subgroup defined similarly to the above, i.e. the isotropy subgroup of any point in the curve that is not fixed. After intersecting with $S^1$, we get a subgroup of the form $\mathbb{Z}_{n}$ (by using continuity of the action in the complex topology). In slight abuse of notation I will always intersect with $S^1$ when referring to the isotropy subgroup.

The example is produced by doing a certain sequence of equivariant blow-ups in fixed points. i.e. equivariant blow-up of a fixed point, and then of a fixed point in the exeptional divisor, and so on. With this process it is possible to construct an action with isotropy subgroups $\mathbb{Z}_k$ for all $k=2,\ldots,k_0$, for any positive integer $k_{0}$. It follows that the restricted action of $\mathbb{Z}_{k_{0}} \subset \mathbb{C}^*$ can have arbitrarily large number of subgroups appearing as isotropy subgroups. These actions are linearizable, because the $\mathbb{C}^*$ action is. Since $H^{1}(S,\mathcal{O}_S)=0$, two line bundles with the same $c_1$ are isomorphic. Pick an ample line bundle, because the torus is connected, $g^*L \cong L$ for any $g \in \mathbb{C}^*$. It follows that the action is linearizable.

So, considering $f$ generating such an action on the surface $S$. Suppose we have an equivariant embedding $i: S \rightarrow \mathbb{CP}^{N}$. Consider the minimal projective subspace containing $i(S)$, it is invariant by a contradiction argument (you could move it by $f$ and intersect again). Furthermore, $f$ generates a faithful, linear $\mathbb{Z}_{k_0}$-action on this minimal subspace $\mathbb{CP}^n$, with $n < N$, by a similar argument. By the fact mentioned in the beginning, the more blow-ups we do to get $S$, the higher $n$ needs to be.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .