The following example shows that your boundthere is close to being optimal. Leta difference between equivariant finite maps and equivariant embeddings, there is no bound in terms of $X$ be$n$ which garuantees an equivariant embedding. The idea of the productexample gives the following byproduct: If $$ \mathbb{P}^1 \times \mathbb{P}^1 \times \ldots \times \mathbb{P}^1,$$ of$f$ has finite order and there are $m$ subgroups appearing as the isotropy subgroup of some point(see below) then, the dimension of the projective space has to be at least $n$$log_{2}(m) -1$.
For a space with a $\mathbb{Z}_k$-action, and letto every point there is a subgroup of $f$ permute$\mathbb{Z}_k$ we can assosiate, consisting of the factors byelements fixing the point, called the isotropy subgroup. The argument uses a cyclic permutationcertain fact: Suppose that $\mathbb{Z}_k$ acts linearly on $\mathbb{CP}^n$, then the possiblities for the isotropy subgroup is at most $2^{n+1}$. This extendsTo prove this note it is possible to lift to a automorphismlinear transformation of $\mathbb{C}^{n+1}$ of order $k$, thus to diagonalize the ambient projective spaceslift. Then the isotropy subgroup of an element $p = [z_{0}: \ldots : z_{n}] \in \mathbb{CP}^n$ depends only on which of the $z_{i}$ are zero, and which are not zero. Therefore there are only $2^{n+1}$ possibilities. To make an analogy with toric geometry, the non-trivial possibilities for the embedding assosiated tostrata are in bijecton with subsimplices of the $\mathcal{O}(1) \otimes \ldots \otimes \mathcal{O}(1)$$(n+1)$-simplex.
Consider anthe $f$$\mathbb{C}^{*}$-equivariant embedding ofaction $Y$$\mathbb{CP}^{2}$ coming from the linear action on $\mathbb{C}^3$ with weights $(0,1,2)$. The embeddingTo any smooth invariant curve there is given by somean isotropy subgroup defined similarly to the above, i.e. the isotropy subgroup of any point in the curve that is not fixed. After intersecting with $\mathcal{O}(a_1) \otimes \ldots \otimes \mathcal{O}(a_k)$ acting by$S^1$, we get a subgroup of the form $f$ on$\mathbb{Z}_{n}$ (by using continuity of the image and pulling back shows thataction in the complex topology). In slight abuse of notation I will always intersect with $a_1=a_{2} = \ldots = a_{k}$$S^1$ when referring to the isotropy subgroup.
The dimensionexample is produced by doing a certain sequence of equivariant blow-ups in fixed points. i.e. equivariant blow-up of a fixed point, and then of a fixed point in the spaceexeptional divisor, and so on. With this process it is possible to construct an action with isotropy subgroups $\mathbb{Z}_k$ for all $k=2,\ldots,k_0$, for any positive integer $k_{0}$. It follows that the restricted action of sections $\mathbb{Z}_{k_{0}} \subset \mathbb{C}^*$ can have arbitrarily large number of subgroups appearing as isotropy subgroups. These actions are linearizable, because the $\mathcal{O}(1) \otimes \ldots \otimes \mathcal{O}(1)$$\mathbb{C}^*$ action is. Since $2^n$$H^{1}(S,\mathcal{O}_S)=0$, two line bundles with the same $c_1$ are isomorphic. Pick an ample line bundle, because the torus is connected, $g^*L \cong L$ for any $g \in \mathbb{C}^*$. It follows that the action is linearizable.
This was example was motivated by Remark 3So, considering $f$ generating such an action on the surface $S$.4 Suppose we have an equivariant embedding $i: S \rightarrow \mathbb{CP}^{N}$.6 of "Linearization of algebraic group actions" Consider the minimal projective subspace containing $i(S)$, it is invariant by Briona contradiction argument (you could move it by $f$ and intersect again). Furthermore, $f$ generates a faithful, linear $\mathbb{Z}_{k_0}$-action on this minimal subspace $\mathbb{CP}^n$, with $n < N$, by a similar argument. By the fact mentioned in the beginning, the more blow-ups we do to get $S$, the higher $n$ needs to be.