8
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal{M}$ be a cocomplete closed symmetric monoidal category. Let $A, B$ be monoids in $\mathcal{M}$ and $f: A \rightarrow B$ be a morphism of monoids. The morphism $f$ induces the extension of scalars functor and the restriction of scalars functor between the categories ${_A\mathrm{Mod}}$ of left $A$-modules and ${_B\mathrm{Mod}}$ of left $B$-modules. These functors form an adjunction between these categories. I am looking for a reference for this adjunction.

In other words, I am looking for a reference to the change of rings adjunction but in the more general case of monoids in a cocomplete closed symmetric monoidal category.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The enriched category theory literature should have this somewhere. Monoids in $\newcommand{\M}{\mathcal{M}}\M$ are one-object $\M$-categories, and modules correspond to $\M$-enriched presheaves, so the change-of-monoid adjunction is a special case of change-of-base between enriched presheaf categories $[A,\M] \to [B,\M]$. Surprisingly, checking a couple of standard sources (Dubuc, Kelly) I can’t find a clean reference for this adjunction either! But searching on keywords “enriched presheaves”, “enriched Kan extensions”, “enriched realization” may be helpful. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 7, 2023 at 11:26
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @PeterLeFanuLumsdaine This appears in Enriched Model Categories and Presheaf Categories as Lemma 2.2. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 7, 2023 at 19:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @PeterLeFanuLumsdaine Thanks a lot! I was not aware of this perspective! That was really helpful! $\endgroup$
    – Angelos
    Commented Nov 13, 2023 at 2:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ConnorMalin That's the adjunction I was looking for. Thanks a lot! $\endgroup$
    – Angelos
    Commented Nov 13, 2023 at 2:51

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Certainly overkill, but this result is a special case of `change of operads' since the given morphism of monoids induces a morphism from the operad $O$ for left $A$-modules to the operad $P$ for left $B$-modules. A published reference is Corollary 5.1.1 in Homotopical Adjoint Lifting Theorem. Tracing through the proof and ignoring all the stuff about model categories, the key categorical result we rely on there is the Adjoint Lifting Theorem, for which we reference Borceux's volume 2, Theorem 4.5.6 on page 226. When we use this result, we take (using the notation of diagram 3.3.6 in our paper) $L = R = Id$ on the underlying category, and so $f^*$ is given by restriction along $f$. In case you don't want to rely on Borceux for the left adjoint, $f_!$ you can also get a direct construction from Section 4 of Resolution of coloured operads and rectification of homotopy algebras paper by Berger and Moerdijk, which again works in the generality of operads.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .