3
$\begingroup$

$\DeclareMathOperator\erf{erf}$ Let's consider the Gaussian distribution $P_X(x)= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \sigma^2}} e^{- \frac{x^2}{2 \sigma^2}}$. Now consider the random variable $W \equiv \max \{ X_1, \dots , X_m \}$, where $X_i \sim P_X(x)$. So $w$ indicates the maximum over $m$ i.i.d. Gaussian draws; we call $P_W(w)$ the corresponding distribution. $P_W(w)$ can be easily calculated from the formula $P_Y(y)=mP_X(y)F_X(y)^{m-1}$, where $F_X(y)$ is the c.d.f. of $P_X(x)$. We get:

$$P_Y(y)= m \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \sigma^2}} e^{- \frac{y^2}{2 \sigma^2}} \left(\frac{1}{2} \left( 1 + \erf \left( \frac{y}{\sqrt{2} \sigma}\right) \right) \right)^{m -1}$$

I'm interested in the convolution between $P_X(x)$ and $P_W(w)$, i.e.:

$$I(\Delta) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty P_X(x') P_W(x'+ \Delta) \, dx'$$

Is it possible to get an analytical closed form or even an approximated solution for $I(\Delta)$?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It seems odd that you initially call the random variable $w=\max\{x_1,\ldots,x_m\}$ but then write $P_W(w),$ as if (capital) $W$ is the random variable and (lower-case) $w$ is the argument to its density function. $\endgroup$ Dec 24, 2022 at 9:12
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have a response to the answer below? $\endgroup$ Dec 24, 2022 at 22:24
  • $\begingroup$ I only read the headline, but won't the convolution with the max give the distribution of X + Max, and isn't that the distribution of max(X+X_1, ..., X + X_n) ? $\endgroup$
    – mike
    Dec 31, 2022 at 9:45

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

It is extremely unlikely that a closed-form expression for this exists in general.

Mathematica cannot find such an expression even when $\sigma=1$, $m=3$, and $\Delta=0$:

enter image description here

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.