Given an ergodic and non-singular dynamic system (definition provided here) $(X, \mathcal{B}, \mu_1, T)$ where $(X, \mathcal{B}, \mu_1)$ is a measure space and $T$ is a fixed transformation, we then will have $\mu_1$ equivalent to $T\mu$ where $T\mu_1$ is defined by $T\mu_1(A)=\mu_1[T^{-1}(A)]$ for each $A\in \mathcal{B}$. Now suppose $\mu_2$ is another measure that is equivalent to $\mu_1$ and makes $(X, \mathcal{B}, \mu_2, T)$ ergodic and non-singular. Hence, we will have $T\mu_2\sim\mu_2\sim\mu_1\sim T\mu_1$. Do we have:
$$ \frac{d\,\mu_1}{d\,\mu_2}\circ T = \frac{d\,T\mu_1}{d\,T\mu_2} $$
$\mu_1$-almost everywhere? Here the "$\mu_1$-almost everywhere" can be replaced by "$\mu_2$-almost everywhere" or any one of those four measures. By definition of $T\mu_2$, for each $A\in\mathcal{B}$, we have:
$$ \int_X\chi_A(x)d\,T\mu_2 = \int_X\chi_A(Tx)d\,\mu_2 $$
I tried to show the following equation holds for each $A\in\mathcal{B}$ but cannot:
$$ \int_A\frac{d\,\mu_1}{d\,\mu_2}(x)d\,T\mu_2 = \int_A\frac{d\,\mu_1}{d\,\mu_2}\circ T(x)d\,\mu_2 = \int_A\frac{d\,T\mu_1}{d\,T\mu_2}(x)d\,\mu_2 $$
Any hints or counter-examples will be appreciated