14
$\begingroup$

Let $T$ be the solid 2-torus and let $\sim$ be the equivalence relation on $T$ generated by the relation $\{(\alpha,\beta) \sim (\beta,\alpha) \mid \alpha, \beta \in S^1\}$ on the boundary $\partial T=S^1\times S^1$. What kind of space is $T/{\sim}$?

I believe that it is $S^3$, but I can't prove it.

I posted this question already here:

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4339019/identifying-boundary-of-solid-torus-with-itself-by-swapping-coordinates

Unfortunately, I didn't get a satisfying answer. Not sure if it's because it is harder than I thought or actually nobody cares. Maybe both :)

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ But the meridian of the torus is contractible in the solid torus and represents a generator for the fundamental group of the Mobius strip. $\endgroup$
    – IJL
    Dec 22, 2021 at 17:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why is your quotient space a manifold? $\endgroup$
    – Tim Campion
    Dec 22, 2021 at 20:02
  • $\begingroup$ @TimCampion oh good question.. I don't know and I will think about it. But I'm not sure if this issue is serious enough to unaccept IJLs answer $\endgroup$ Dec 22, 2021 at 20:58
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @TimCampion The only issues would be on the diagonal. Pick a tubular neighborhood of the diagonal of $S^1 \times S^1$ such that the involution acts as negation on the fibers. Now pick a point $p$ in the diagonal. We can write down a nice half open neighborhood of $p$ by taking a small open neighborhood of $p$ in the diagonal, taking the restriction of the tubular neighborhood, and then taking the collar on that in the solid torus. By construction, the gluing can be viewed as gluing $\mathbb{R}_p \times [0,1)$ along negation on $\mathbb{R}$, parametrized by the points in the open around p. $\endgroup$ Dec 22, 2021 at 22:13
  • $\begingroup$ @TimCampion It is geometrically clear that these 2 dimensional gluings give $\mathbb{R}^2$ (it's like taping the edge of a sheet of paper to itself). So when we parametrize by the open neighborhood of $p$ in the diagonal, it becomes a $\mathbb{R}^3$. $\endgroup$ Dec 22, 2021 at 22:15

3 Answers 3

12
$\begingroup$

Your quotient manifold is homeomorphic to $S^3$. I know this because it is a closed 3-manifold and its fundamental group is trivial, so I'm quoting the Poincare conjecture/Perelmann's theorem. The fundamental group can be seen to be trivial because there is a CW-decomposition of the (2-manifold) torus with one 0-cell, three 1-cells and two 2-cells that is respected by your involution, where the 1-cells are the longitude, meridian and diagonal of the torus, and the two 2-cells are triangles. The involution swaps the longitude and meridian while fixing the diagonal pointwise, and swaps the two 2-cells. The quotient of the torus by the involution has one vertex, two 1-cells and one 2-cell. The fundamental group of this space is infinite cyclic, generated by the loop around the 1-cell that started life as both the longitude and meridian of the torus.
This quotient space can be viewed as a copy of the Mobius strip, as in Taras Banakh's comment.

But now think about how the insides fits in: a CW-structure on the solid torus can be made by adding in one more 2-cell, attached around the meridian of the torus, and one 3-cell. The extra 2-cell wraps around the generator for the fundamental group of the piece discussed in the previous paragraph. So the fundamental group of the overall space is trivial.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thx for this nice answer! $\endgroup$ Dec 22, 2021 at 18:46
12
$\begingroup$

I believe that your quotient space can be seen as the quotient of the $3$-sphere $S^3$ in $\mathbf C^2$ by the action of complex conjugation. The $3$-sphere $S^3$ can be identified with the join $S^1\star iS^1$ of the real circle $S^1=S^3\cap \mathbf R^2$ with the imaginary circle $iS^1=S^3\cap i\mathbf R^2$. Since complex conjugation acts trivially on $S^1$ and antipodally on $iS^1$, the quotient space is again homeomorphic to a join $S^1\star S^1$ of $2$ circles, hence is a $3$-sphere.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thx for this nice answer! $\endgroup$ Dec 22, 2021 at 18:46
9
$\begingroup$

As yet another proof: let $M$ be the quotient of $\partial T$. Let $U$ be a small closed regular neighbourhood of $M$. Thus $U$ is a solid torus. Let $V$ be the closure of the complement of $U$. So $V$ is $T$, minus an open regular neighbourhood of its boundary. So $V$ is another solid torus. Let $S$ be the intersection of $U$ and $V$. So $S$ is a (genus one) Heegaard surface for the three-manifold. It is an “exercise” to show that the boundaries of the meridian disk in $U$ and $V$, respectively, meet once. Thus $S$ is the standard Heegaard splitting of the three-sphere.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.